Liberal Privilege in Academic Psychology and the Social Sciences

@article{Jussim2012LiberalPI,
  title={Liberal Privilege in Academic Psychology and the Social Sciences},
  author={Lee Jussim},
  journal={Perspectives on Psychological Science},
  year={2012},
  volume={7},
  pages={504 - 507}
}
  • L. Jussim
  • Published 1 September 2012
  • Education
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science
This comment is in two parts. The first presents some implications of Inbar and Lammers’ (2012, this issue) findings by making salient many of the advantages and privileges enjoyed by scientists when they extol the moral and intellectual superiority of liberals, liberal beliefs, liberal attitudes, and liberal policy preferences over conservatives, conservative beliefs, conservative attitudes, and conservative policy preferences. The second part of this comment refutes (or, at least, vigorously… 
Viewpoint Bias and Cultural Competency Advocacy Within Applied Psychology
This chapter argues that cultural competence advocacy is characterized by a palpable viewpoint bias. This bias is rooted in the distinction between the “unconstrained” versus “constrained”
Quantifying Common Criticisms of Evolutionary Psychology
In a sample of academics (N = 111), we quantified the dimensions underlying criticisms of evolutionary psychology in relation to criticisms of its parent fields (i.e., general psychology and
Ideological Bias in Social Psychological Research
“Getting it right” is the sine qua non of science (Funder et al., 2013 ). Science can tolerate individual mistakes and fl awed theories, but only if it has reliable mechanisms for correction.
Political diversity will improve social psychological science.
TLDR
This article reviews the available evidence and finds support for four claims: (1) Academic psychology once had considerable political diversity, but has lost nearly all of it in the last 50 years, and increased political diversity would improve social psychological science by reducing the impact of bias mechanisms such as confirmation bias, and by empowering dissenting minorities to improve the quality of the majority's thinking.
Sociopolitical insularity is psychology's Achilles heel.
TLDR
Academic psychology has become increasingly non-diverse politically, which skews and impedes social psychological science, and should embrace viewpoint diversity, to produce a more robust, open, and creative psychological science.
Do beliefs about psychologists’ political biases matter? Perceived political ideology moderates how laypeople construe research on wrongdoing
Abstract Two studies examine a possible consequence – namely, unwanted reactions to psychological research on wrongdoing – if laypeople perceive psychologists to have liberal tendencies. Study 1
An Empirical Study of Political Bias in Legal Scholarship
Law professors routinely accuse each other of making politically biased arguments in their scholarship. They have also helped produce a large empirical literature on judicial behavior that finds that
An Empirical Study of Political Bias in Legal Scholarship
Law professors routinely accuse each other of making politically biased arguments in their scholarship. They have also helped produce a large empirical literature on judicial behavior that finds that
How Ideology Has Hindered Sociological Insight
American sociology has consistently leaned toward the political Left. This ideological skew hinders sociological insight in three ways. First, the scope of research projects is constrained:
It may be harder than we thought, but political diversity will (still) improve social psychological science.
TLDR
It is argued that increasing political diversity in social psychology may be harder than previously thought, but it is still believed that it is possible and desirable to do so.
...
1
2
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 22 REFERENCES
Political Diversity in Social and Personality Psychology
  • Y. Inbar, J. Lammers
  • Psychology
    Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science
  • 2012
TLDR
Surprisingly, although only 6% described themselves as conservative “overall,” there was more diversity of political opinion on economic issues and foreign policy and the more liberal respondents were, the more they said they would discriminate against openly conservative colleagues.
Politics and Professional Advancement Among College Faculty
This article first examines the ideological composition of American university faculty and then tests whether ideological homogeneity has become self-reinforcing. A randomly based national survey of
Publish or Politic: Referee Bias in Manuscript Review1
To clarify the role of cognitive bias in manuscript review, designated more and less politically liberal area specialists and nonspecialists were sent either of two versions of a brief empirical
The Estrangement of Social Constructionism and Experimental Social Psychology: History of the Rift and Prospects for Reconciliation
Social constructionism and experimental social psychology represent two complementary paradigms for understanding human social behavior, but over the last quarter century they have remained oddly and
Social Perception and Social Reality: Why Accuracy Dominates Bias and Self-Fulfilling Prophecy
Social Perception and Social Reality (Jussim 2012) reviews the evidence in social psychology and related fields and reaches three conclusions: (1) Although errors, biases, and self-fulfilling
Effects of Behavioral and Social Class Information on Social Judgment
Social class schemata appear to affect perceivers' judgments of targets under conditions of stimulus ambiguity. In 1990 E. E. Jones noted that there are insufficient data to determine the effect of
The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion
The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion Jonathan Haidt Pantheon Books, 2012One has likely heard that, for the sake of decorum, religion and politics should never be
Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place
In this paper, I attempt to reconceptualize validity within the context of openly ideological research.~ The usefulness of this reconceptualization is tested by applying it to examples from three
False-Positive Psychology
TLDR
It is shown that despite empirical psychologists’ nominal endorsement of a low rate of false-positive findings, flexibility in data collection, analysis, and reporting dramatically increases actual false- positive rates, and a simple, low-cost, and straightforwardly effective disclosure-based solution is suggested.
...
1
2
3
...