Letter: Commentary: Deep Brain Stimulation as Clinical Innovation: An Ethical and Organizational Framework to Sustain Deliberations about Psychiatric Deep Brain Stimulation.

@article{Racine2017LetterCD,
  title={Letter: Commentary: Deep Brain Stimulation as Clinical Innovation: An Ethical and Organizational Framework to Sustain Deliberations about Psychiatric Deep Brain Stimulation.},
  author={Eric Racine and T. P. Udhaya Sankar and Philip Leger and Emily Bell},
  journal={Neurosurgery},
  year={2017},
  volume={80 6},
  pages={
          E269-E270
        }
}
Joseph J. Fins (Commentary: Deep brain stimulation as clinical innovation: An ethical and organizational framework to sustain deliberations about psychiatric deep brain stimulation)1 takes issue with our proposal to guide ethical thinking about the potential use of deep brain stimulation (DBS) as a form of clinical innovation in the context of psychiatric conditions.2 Clinical innovation falls neither squarely in the category of therapeutic usage nor research usage and is therefore not well… CONTINUE READING
BETA

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 11 REFERENCES

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…