Let’s make peer review scientific

@article{Rennie2016LetsMP,
  title={Let’s make peer review scientific},
  author={D. Rennie},
  journal={Nature},
  year={2016},
  volume={535},
  pages={31-33}
}
  • D. Rennie
  • Published 2016
  • Sociology, Medicine
  • Nature
Thirty years on from the first congress on peer review, Drummond Rennie reflects on the improvements brought about by research into the process — and calls for more. 
Reviewing Manuscripts: A Systematic Approach.
Unlock ways to share data on peer review
Peer Review – the future is here
Peer review: A good but flawed system?
The "new realities" of peer review.
  • B. Yates
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Journal of neurophysiology
  • 2017
Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 20 REFERENCES
Journal peer review.
Is open peer review the fairest system? Yes
  • T. Groves
  • Medicine
  • BMJ : British Medical Journal
  • 2010
The need for a research agenda.
Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping
Publication bias in editorial decision making.
Registering clinical trials.
...
1
2
...