• DOI:10.1017/S0305741000010407
• Corpus ID: 154407265

Leninism and Maoism: Some Populist Perspectives in Marxism-Leninism in China

@article{Meisner1971LeninismAM,
  title={Leninism and Maoism: Some Populist Perspectives in Marxism-Leninism in China},
  author={Maurice J. Meisner},
  journal={The China Quarterly},
  year={1971},
  volume={45},
  pages={2 - 36}
}

• Maurice J. Meisner
• Published 1 March 1971
• Art
• The China Quarterly

Isaac Deutscher once observed that the Chinese Communist revolution presents the paradox of “the most archaic of nations avidly absorbing the most modern of revolutionary doctrines, the last word in revolution, and translating it into action. Lacking any native ancestry, Chinese Communism descends straight from Bolshevism. Mao stands on Lenin's shoulders.” This echoes the generally accepted view of the historical relationship between Maoism and Leninism. Among most western students of Chinese communism it is something of a truism that Marxism came to China in its Leninist form; for different reasons, Maoists have long been saying that Mao (and now only Mao) is the true heir of Lenin. Indeed, the “thought of Mao Tse-tung” is no longer simply considered the practical application of “the universal truths” of Marxism-Leninism to the specifically Chinese historical situation, but is explicitly celebrated as a new and higher stage of universally valid revolutionary theory; it is “invincible Marxism-Leninism-Mao Tsetung Thought” that now propels world history forward. In contemporary Maoist eyes, Mao stands on the shoulders of Lenin as firmly as Lenin presumably stands on the shoulders of Marx.