Leibniz’s Infinitesimals: Their Fictionality, Their Modern Implementations, and Their Foes from Berkeley to Russell and Beyond

@article{Katz2013LeibnizsIT,
  title={Leibniz’s Infinitesimals: Their Fictionality, Their Modern Implementations, and Their Foes from Berkeley to Russell and Beyond},
  author={M. Katz and David Sherry},
  journal={Erkenntnis},
  year={2013},
  volume={78},
  pages={571-625}
}
Many historians of the calculus deny significant continuity between infinitesimal calculus of the seventeenth century and twentieth century developments such as Robinson’s theory. Robinson’s hyperreals, while providing a consistent theory of infinitesimals, require the resources of modern logic; thus many commentators are comfortable denying a historical continuity. A notable exception is Robinson himself, whose identification with the Leibnizian tradition inspired Lakatos, Laugwitz, and others… Expand

Figures from this paper

Leibniz's well-founded fictions and their interpretations
Leibniz used the term fiction in conjunction with infinitesimals. What kind of fictions they were exactly is a subject of scholarly dispute. The position of Bos and Mancosu contrasts with that ofExpand
EQUIVOCATION IN THE FOUNDATIONS OF LEIBNIZ’S INFINITESIMAL FICTIONS
In this article, I address two different kinds of equivocations in reading Leibniz’s fictional infinite and infinitesimal. These equivocations form the background of a reductive reading of infiniteExpand
Namur Is mathematical history written by the victors ?
We examine prevailing philosophical and historical views about the origin of infinitesimal mathematics in light of modern infinitesimal theories, and show the works of Fermat, Leibniz, Euler, CauchyExpand
Procedures of Leibnizian infinitesimal calculus: an account in three modern frameworks
Recent Leibniz scholarship has sought to gauge which foundational framework provides the most successful account of the procedures of the Leibnizian calculus (LC). While many scholars (e.g.,Expand
Leibniz versus Ishiguro: Closing a Quarter Century of Syncategoremania
Did Leibniz exploit infinitesimals and infinities à la rigueur or only as shorthand for quantified propositions that refer to ordinary Archimedean magnitudes? Hidé Ishiguro defends the latterExpand
Infinitesimals as an Issue of Neo-Kantian Philosophy of Science
  • T. Mormann, M. Katz
  • Mathematics, Physics
  • HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science
  • 2013
We seek to elucidate the philosophical context in which one of the most important conceptual transformations of modern mathematics took place, namely, the so-called revolution in rigor inExpand
Ju n 20 13 IS MATHEMATICAL HISTORY WRITTEN BY THE VICTORS ?
We examine prevailing philosophical and historical views about the origin of infinitesimal mathematics in light of modern infinitesimal theories, and show the works of Fermat, Leibniz, Euler, CauchyExpand
Interpreting the Infinitesimal Mathematics of Leibniz and Euler
Abstract We apply Benacerraf’s distinction between mathematical ontology and mathematical practice (or the structures mathematicians use in practice) to examine contrasting interpretations ofExpand
Controversies in the Foundations of Analysis: Comments on Schubring’s Conflicts
Foundations of Science recently published a rebuttal to a portion of our essay it published 2 years ago. The author, G. Schubring, argues that our 2013 text treated unfairly his 2005 book, ConflictsExpand
Fermat’s Dilemma: Why Did He Keep Mum on Infinitesimals? And the European Theological Context
The first half of the 17th century was a time of intellectual ferment when wars of natural philosophy were echoes of religious wars, as we illustrate by a case study of an apparently innocuousExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 156 REFERENCES
Leibniz’s syncategorematic infinitesimals
AbstractIn contrast with some recent theories of infinitesimals as non-Archimedean entities, Leibniz’s mature interpretation was fully in accord with the Archimedean Axiom: infinitesimals areExpand
Leibniz on The Elimination of Infinitesimals
My aim in this paper is to consider Leibniz’s response to concerns raised about the foundations of his differential calculus, and specifically with his doctrine that infinitesimals are “fictions,”Expand
George Berkeley, The analyst (1734)
Publisher Summary George Berkeley's work, “ The analyst ,” is a criticism of the calculus, in both its Newtonian and Leibnizian formulations, arguing that the foundations of the calculus areExpand
BERKELEY'S CRITICISM OF THE INFINITESIMAL
  • J. Wisdom
  • Sociology
  • The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
  • 1953
IN his two notebooks, now known as Philosophical Commentaries, which contain the raw materials of his thought when he was a very young man, Berkeley made a number of critical remarks aboutExpand
THE TENSION BETWEEN INTUITIVE INFINITESIMALS AND FORMAL MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS
Abstract: we discuss the repercussions of the development of infinitesimal calculus into modern analysis, beginning with viewpoints expressed in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries and relatingExpand
Infinitesimal Differences: Controversies between Leibniz and his Contemporaries
The development of the calculus during the 17th century was successful in mathematical practice, but raised questions about the nature of infinitesimals: were they real or rather fictitious? ThisExpand
Meaning in Classical Mathematics: Is it at Odds with Intuitionism?
We examine the classical/intuitionist divide, and how it reflects on modern theories of infinitesimals. When leading intuitionist Heyting announced that "the creation of non-standard analysis is aExpand
On Cauchy's Notion of Infinitesimal
The historical literature of nineteenth century mathematical analysis contains much discussion of Cauchy's conception of the continuum, and of the nature of his infinitesimals in particular. In aExpand
Leibniz's laws of continuity and homogeneity
We explore Leibniz's understanding of the differential calculus, and argue that his methods were more coherent than is generally recognized. The foundations of the historical infinitesimal calculusExpand
The practice of reason : Leibniz and his controversies
1. Foreword 2. Abbreviations 3. Contributors 4. 1. The principle of continuity and the 'paradox' of Leibnizian mathematics (by Serfati, Michel) 5. 2. Geometrization or mathematization: ChristiaanExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...