Legislation and Adjudication in the UN Security Council: Bringing Down the Deliberative Deficit

@article{Johnstone2008LegislationAA,
  title={Legislation and Adjudication in the UN Security Council: Bringing Down the Deliberative Deficit},
  author={Ian M. Johnstone},
  journal={American Journal of International Law},
  year={2008},
  volume={102},
  pages={275 - 308}
}
  • I. Johnstone
  • Published 1 April 2008
  • Political Science
  • American Journal of International Law
Critiques of decision making in international organizations are often framed in terms of the democratic deficit. Leveled against the United Nations Security Council, the charge has become more pointed in light of recent quasi-legislative and quasi-judicial acts—most notably the adoption of Resolutions 1373 and 1540 on the financing of terrorism and the spread of weapons of mass destruction, respectively, and the Resolution 1267 sanctions regime, which targets individuals suspected of… 
The Powers of the United Nations Security Council under Law
In the light of concern about the growing levels of power which the United Nations Security Council has begun to exercise in recent years, this thesis aims to establish the limits of the Council’s
Bottom-Up Constitutionalization of International Law: The Targeted Sanctions Regime as a Case Study
  • E. Benvenisti
  • Law, Political Science
    Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting
  • 2010
Beginning with Resolution 1267 (1999), a series of Chapter VII resolutions (SCRs) mandated that states impose asset freezes and travel bans on persons determined by the UN Security Council's (SC)
The practice of the United Nations in combating terrorism from 1946-2008 : questions of legality and legitimacy
Over the last thirty years, the UN has shown an unmistakable interest in combating terrorism. In this study, the practice of the General Assembly and the Security Council in combating terrorism is
The Security Council and the International Criminal Court: The Unsolved Puzzle of Article 16
Article 16 is one of the most contested provisions of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. It authorizes the Security Council to suspend the Court’s investigations and prosecutions
Starving terrorists of their financial oxygen – at all costs?
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to argue that the leadin‘g international actor responsible for the maintenance of peace and security, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), must ensure
The Decay of Consent: International Law in an Age of Global Public Goods
  • Nico Krisch
  • Political Science
    American Journal of International Law
  • 2014
The consensual structure of the international legal order, with its strong emphasis on the sovereign equality of states, has always been somewhat precarious. In different waves over the centuries, it
Hijacking Counterterrorism: The Rise of National Anti-Terrorism Laws After 9/11
Author(s): Cody, Stephen Smith | Advisor(s): Fourcade, Marion | Abstract: In less than a decade 142 countries enacted or reformed more than 260 counterterrorism laws worldwide. The new laws, viewed
The European Union and the Globalisation of Criminal Law
  • V. Mitsilegas
  • Political Science, Law
    Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies
  • 2010
Abstract In the new post-Cold War security era, there is a perception that the nature of cross-border security threats has changed. The need to respond to these new threats has led to a proliferation
Particularized protection: UNSC mandates and the protection of civilians in armed conflict
ABSTRACT The protection of civilians at risk in armed conflict has, since the late 1990s, become institutionalized at the United Nations (UN), gaining acceptance as a normative rationale for UN
The UN Security Council, normative legitimacy and the challenge of specificity
ABSTRACT This paper discusses how the general and abstract concept of legitimacy applies to international institutions, using the United Nations Security Council as an example. We argue that the
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 21 REFERENCES
Judging the Security Council
  • J. Álvarez
  • Political Science, Law
    American Journal of International Law
  • 1996
Should the International Court of Justice (ICJ) “judicially review” Security Council decisions? The question, once fanciful, is now being asked seriously by litigants in and judges on the World
The Rule of (Administrative) Law in International Law
In this paper, I argue that one can make a good case for the continuing immaturity of international law in the failure of international organizations to provide the controls of the rule of law which
On the Creation of a Global Peoples Assembly: Legitimacy and the Power of Popular Sovereignty
This article makes the theoretical case for a civil society initiated Global Peoples Assembly (GPA) that would be popularly elected by the global citizenry. The authors argue that if civil society
FASSBENDER, supra note 111, pt. C, para. 11. The Fassbender, Biersteker and Eckert, and Cameron studies all analyze and set out various due process rights recognized in international law
    Martti Koskenniemi, The Police in the Temple: Order, Justice and the UN: A Dialectical View, 6 EUR
    • J. INT'L L
    • 1995
    at 7; see also FASSBENDER, supra note 111
      For the application of administrative law standards of procedural fairness to global governance, see Benedict Kingsbury
      • 2004
      Koskenniemi states that the fundamental problem with the Security Council as dispenser of j ustice-as opposed to guardian of order-is its lack of accountability within the UN system. Koskenniemi
      • J. INT'L L
      • 2006
      I would like to thank Ulrik Ahnfeldt-Mollerup for drawing my attention to this point
        ...
        ...