Legal Realism, Common Courtesy, and Hypocrisy

@article{Bybee2005LegalRC,
  title={Legal Realism, Common Courtesy, and Hypocrisy},
  author={Keith J. Bybee},
  journal={Law, Culture and the Humanities},
  year={2005},
  volume={1},
  pages={102 - 75}
}
  • Keith J. Bybee
  • Published 1 February 2005
  • Sociology
  • Law, Culture and the Humanities
In the USA, courts are publicly defined by their distance from politics. Politics is said to be a matter of interest, competition, and compromise. Law, by contrast, is said to be a matter of principle and impartial reason. This distinction between courts and politics, though common, is also commonly doubted – and this raises difficult questions. How can the courts at once be in politics yet not be of politics? If the judiciary is mired in politics, how can one be sure that all the talk of law… 
2 Citations
Constitutional Jurisprudence in the Supreme Court of Venezuela
The prime focus of this dissertation consists in exploring constitutional jurisprudence in the Supreme Court of Venezuela over the last five decades, making use of arguments drawn from Venezuelan
Approaches to Law and Popular Culture
MICHAEL ASIMOW AND SHANNON MADER. 2004. Law and Popular Culture: A Course Book. New York: Peter Lang. ELAYNE RAPPING. 2003. Law and Justice as Seen on TV. New York: New York University Press. TIMOTHY

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 12 REFERENCES
The Supreme Court Opinion As Institutional Practice: Dissent, Legal Scholarship, and Decisionmaking in the Taft Court
The Supreme Court Opinion as Institutional Practice explores historical transformations in practices of Supreme Court decision-making and opinion-writing. It compares the Court's modern practices to
Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change
In 1974, Marc Galanter published an article in Law and Society Review that has become a classic in the sociology of law. Entitled “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal
In litigation : do the "haves" still come out ahead?
Marc Galanter's seminal work, "Why the 'Haves' Come Out Ahead," is among the most well-cited law review articles of all time. With his distinction between experienced "repeat players" and
Judicial Behavior and Public Opinion: Popular Expectations Regarding the Factors That Influence Supreme Court Decisions
This article examines the mass public's perceptions of the factors that actually influence Supreme Court decisions as well those that ought to influence such decisions. We expect significant
Measuring Attitudes toward the United States Supreme Court
It is conventional in research on the legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court to rely on a survey question asking about confidence in the leaders of the Court to indicate something about the esteem with
The Eti-ology of Public Support for the Supreme Court
A method of polymerizing propylene to obtain a polymer having a high apparent density which comprises first polymerizing propylene in the liquid phase at relatively low temperature in the presence of
Taking the High Road: Civility, Judicial Independence, and the Rule of Law
  • 2001
For specific discussion of how opinion elites and African Americans evaluate the Supreme Court in bluntly political terms, see Caldeira and Gibson
  • The Journal of Politics
  • 1992
Available at American Prospect Website. Visited
  • American Prospect
Civility or Honesty?
  • Which Should You Choose?,'' Intellectual Property Today
...
1
2
...