Left ventricular endocardial pacing improves the clinical efficacy in a non-responder to cardiac resynchronization therapy: role of acute haemodynamic testing.

@article{Bracke2010LeftVE,
  title={Left ventricular endocardial pacing improves the clinical efficacy in a non-responder to cardiac resynchronization therapy: role of acute haemodynamic testing.},
  author={Frank A. Bracke and Patrick Houthuizen and Braim Mohammed Rahel and Berry M. van Gelder},
  journal={Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology},
  year={2010},
  volume={12 7},
  pages={
          1032-4
        }
}
Recently, emphasis has been shifted from patient selection to more optimal pacing sites in non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We present a patient who was a non-responder during both acute haemodynamic testing at implant as well as clinically thereafter. After first demonstrating acute haemodynamic improvement using LV d P /d t max during a temporary left ventricular (LV) endocardial pacing setup, a permanent LV endocardial lead was transseptally implanted with… CONTINUE READING

Figures and Topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 11 CITATIONS

Haemodynamic evaluation of alternative left ventricular endocardial pacing sites in clinical non-responders to cardiac resynchronisation therapy

  • Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation
  • 2016
VIEW 12 EXCERPTS
CITES METHODS & BACKGROUND
HIGHLY INFLUENCED

References

Publications referenced by this paper.

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…