Leaving theory behind: Why simplistic hypothesis testing is bad for International Relations

  title={Leaving theory behind: Why simplistic hypothesis testing is bad for International Relations},
  author={J. Mearsheimer and S. Walt},
  journal={European Journal of International Relations},
  pages={427 - 457}
  • J. Mearsheimer, S. Walt
  • Published 2013
  • Sociology
  • European Journal of International Relations
  • Theory creating and hypothesis testing are both critical components of social science, but the former is ultimately more important. Yet, in recent years, International Relations scholars have devoted less effort to creating and refining theories or using theory to guide empirical research. Instead, they increasingly focus on ‘simplistic hypothesis testing,’ which emphasizes discovering well-verified empirical regularities. Privileging simplistic hypothesis testing is a mistake, however, because… CONTINUE READING
    185 Citations
    Resurrecting IR theory: Editors’ introduction to a special section
    • 1
    Deep theorizing in International Relations
    • 12
    • PDF
    Micro-moves in International Relations theory
    • 66
    • PDF


    International Relations Theory and China's Rise: Assessing China's Potential for Territorial Expansion
    • 64
    • PDF
    The Reductionist Gamble: Open Economy Politics in the Global Economy
    • 128
    • PDF
    What Rationality Assumption? or, How ‘Positive Political Theory’ Rests on a Mistake
    • 17
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    International Relations in the US Academy
    • 101
    • Highly Influential
    Sorting Through the Wealth of Notions
    • 50
    The Limits of Inference without Theory
    • 57
    Instruments, Randomization, and Learning about Development
    • 980
    • PDF
    Active Citation: A Precondition for Replicable Qualitative Research
    • 60
    • PDF