Leaving theory behind: Why simplistic hypothesis testing is bad for International Relations

@article{Mearsheimer2013LeavingTB,
  title={Leaving theory behind: Why simplistic hypothesis testing is bad for International Relations},
  author={J. Mearsheimer and S. Walt},
  journal={European Journal of International Relations},
  year={2013},
  volume={19},
  pages={427 - 457}
}
Theory creating and hypothesis testing are both critical components of social science, but the former is ultimately more important. Yet, in recent years, International Relations scholars have devoted less effort to creating and refining theories or using theory to guide empirical research. Instead, they increasingly focus on ‘simplistic hypothesis testing,’ which emphasizes discovering well-verified empirical regularities. Privileging simplistic hypothesis testing is a mistake, however, because… Expand
Resurrecting IR theory: Editors’ introduction to a special section
Deep theorizing in International Relations
Micro-moves in International Relations theory
Realist avenues to global International Relations
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 120 REFERENCES
The Reductionist Gamble: Open Economy Politics in the Global Economy
International Relations in the US Academy
Sorting Through the Wealth of Notions
The Limits of Inference without Theory
Instruments, Randomization, and Learning about Development
Active Citation: A Precondition for Replicable Qualitative Research
  • A. Moravcsik
  • Political Science
  • PS: Political Science & Politics
  • 2010
...
1
2
3
4
5
...