Leaving theory behind: Why simplistic hypothesis testing is bad for International Relations

  title={Leaving theory behind: Why simplistic hypothesis testing is bad for International Relations},
  author={John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt},
  journal={European Journal of International Relations},
  pages={427 - 457}
Theory creating and hypothesis testing are both critical components of social science, but the former is ultimately more important. Yet, in recent years, International Relations scholars have devoted less effort to creating and refining theories or using theory to guide empirical research. Instead, they increasingly focus on ‘simplistic hypothesis testing,’ which emphasizes discovering well-verified empirical regularities. Privileging simplistic hypothesis testing is a mistake, however, because… Expand
Induction and Deduction in International Relations: Squaring the Circle Between Theory and Evidence
International Relations (IR) scholarship represents the pursuit of theory about how the world works or ought to work. Yet despite this broad orientation of the field, the process of theory buildingExpand
Politics is too important to be left to political scientists: A critique of the theory–policy nexus in International Relations
Albeit fashionable in some academic circles, the idea that International Relations theory should influence practice is based on the problematic view that scholars allegedly have a privilegedExpand
The closing of the American mind: ‘American School’ International Relations and the state of grand theory
Senior ‘American School’ International Relations theorists — John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, Robert Keohane, and others — have evinced a growing concern about a rise of technocraticExpand
A Foreign Policy Analysis Perspective on the Domestic Politics Turn in IR Theory
Over the last 25 years, there has been a noteworthy turn across major International Relations (IR) theories to include domestic politics and decision-making factors. Neoclassical realism and variantsExpand
Theorizing the Political Relevance of International Relations Theory
Two broad positions—the “gap-bridgers” and the “gap-minders”—dominate the current debate on the (lack of) political relevance of International Relations (IR) theory. Missing from this debate,Expand
Resurrecting IR theory: Editors’ introduction to a special section
As a discipline, international relations (IR) has become increasingly circumspect about the role and explanatory power of theories of international politics (e.g. Mearsheimer and Walt, 2013;Expand
Deep theorizing in International Relations
This article starts from the observation that International Relations scholars do not agree on what they mean by theory. The declining popularity of grand theory and the celebration of theoreticalExpand
US Dominance and American Bias in International Relations Scholarship: A View from the Outside
  • Evelyn Goh
  • Political Science
  • Journal of Global Security Studies
  • 2019
This article responds to the Journal of Global Security Studies special issue on “American Perspectives and Blind Spots on World Politics,” edited by Jeff Colgan. It applauds their significantExpand
Micro-moves in International Relations theory
This article posits empirical and political reasons for recent ‘micro-moves’ in several contemporary debates, and seeks to further develop them in future International Relations studies. As evidencedExpand
Realist avenues to global International Relations
Realism has long been criticized by global IR, but the former can contribute to the latter and thereby improve explanations of international relations. Global IR criticizes that realism supposedlyExpand


Richness, Rigor, and Relevance in the Study of Soviet Foreign Policy
A short time ago, a group of senior specialists in the study of Soviet foreign policy gathered to assess the state of their field, Though none disputed the view that “we know more now than we did aExpand
International Relations Theory and China's Rise: Assessing China's Potential for Territorial Expansion
Whether China’s rise as a great power will be peaceful or violent is a question that animates scholars and policymakers alike. Power transition theory and offensive realism reach pessimisticExpand
The Reductionist Gamble: Open Economy Politics in the Global Economy
Abstract International political economy (IPE) should transition to “third-wave” scholarship because Open Economy Politics (OEP), which dominates current American IPE scholarship, can generateExpand
What Rationality Assumption? or, How ‘Positive Political Theory’ Rests on a Mistake
In this article I address the reception of game-theoretic methods in political science. In particular I challenge the notion that such methods afford a plausible basis for what is commonly calledExpand
International Relations in the US Academy
Using two new data sources to describe trends in the international relations (IR) discipline since 1980—a database of every article published in the 12 leading journals in the field and three surveysExpand
Rational Deterrence Theory and Comparative Case Studies
Rational deterrence is a more successful theory than portrayed in this literature, and it remains the only intellectually powerful alternative available. Expand
Sorting Through the Wealth of Notions
The opportunity to better inform the readership of International Security on the important contributions of a rational choice perspective is most welcome. We and Stephen Walt agree on many issues. HeExpand
The Limits of Inference without Theory
In this rigorous and well-crafted work, Kenneth Wolpin examines the role of theory in inferential empirical work in economics and the social sciences in general--that is, any research that uses rawExpand
Instruments, Randomization, and Learning about Development
There is currently much debate about the effectiveness of foreign aid and about what kind of projects can engender economic development. There is skepticism about the ability of econometric analysisExpand
Active Citation: A Precondition for Replicable Qualitative Research
  • A. Moravcsik
  • Political Science
  • PS: Political Science & Politics
  • 2010
Qualitative research dominates political science. In the field of international relations (IR), for example, about 70% of scholars primarily employ qualitative methods, compared to 21% favoringExpand