Learning Together Slowly: Bayesian Learning about Political Facts

  title={Learning Together Slowly: Bayesian Learning about Political Facts},
  author={Seth J. Hill},
  journal={The Journal of Politics},
  pages={1403 - 1418}
Although many studies suggest that voters learn about political facts with prejudice toward their preexisting beliefs, none have fully characterized all inputs to Bayes’ Rule, leaving uncertainty about the magnitude of bias. This paper evaluates political learning by first highlighting the importance of careful measures of each input and then presenting a statistical model and experiment that measure the magnitude of departure from Bayesian learning. Subjects learn as cautious Bayesians… Expand
Bayesian or biased? Analytic thinking and political belief updating
Two studies designed to address limitations in the hypothesis that cognitive sophistication magnifies politically biased processing of new information find consistent evidence that greater analytic thinking was associated with posterior beliefs closer to the benchmark. Expand
The Imperfect Beliefs Voting Model
In real-life elections, voters do not have full information over the policy platforms proposed by political parties. Instead, they form (imprecise) beliefs. I propose a new model of partisanExpand
Experimental Measurement of Misperception in Political Beliefs
Recent research suggests widespread misperception about the political views of others. Measuring perceptions often relies on instruments that do not separate uncertainty from inaccuracy. We presentExpand
The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation
Despite a scientific consensus, citizens are divided when it comes to climate change — often along political lines. Democrats or liberals tend to believe that human activity is a primary cause ofExpand
Self-Awareness of Political Knowledge
Despite widespread concern over false beliefs about politically-relevant facts, little is known about how strongly Americans believe their answers to poll questions. I propose a conceptual frameworkExpand
The Distortion of Related Beliefs
When forming beliefs about themselves, politics, and how the world works more generally, people often face a tension between conclusions they inherently wish to reach and those which are plausible.Expand
Biased belief in the Bayesian brain: A deeper look at the evidence
It is argued that the remaining evidence does not demonstrate convincing violations of Bayesian inference in human belief updating; primarily because this evidence derives from study designs that produce results that are not obviously inconsistent with Bayesian principles. Expand
The fact remains: Party ID moderates how voters respond to economic change
Abstract Recent research suggests that party identification biases voters' economic perceptions in general, but that all voters respond to economic change at the same rate. This implies that votersExpand
The Effects of Certain and Uncertain Incentives on Effort and Knowledge Accuracy
Abstract In many situations, incentives exist to acquire knowledge and make correct political decisions. We conduct an experiment that contributes to a small but growing literature on incentives andExpand
Political Misinformation
Misinformation occurs when people hold incorrect factual beliefs and do so confidently. The problem plagues political systems and is exceedingly difficult to correct. In this review, we assess theExpand


Managing Self-Confidence ∗
Stylized evidence suggests that people process information about their own ability in a biased manner. We provide a precise characterization of the nature and extent of these biases. We directlyExpand
Partisan Bias and the Bayesian Ideal in the Study of Public Opinion
Bayes’ Theorem is increasingly used as a benchmark against which to judge the quality of citizens’ thinking, but some of its implications are not well understood. A common claim is that BayesiansExpand
▪ Abstract Do people assimilate new information in an efficient and unbiased manner—that is, do they update prior beliefs in accordance with Bayes' rule? Or are they selective in the way that theyExpand
Rational Learning and Partisan Attitudes
Theory: Characterizing voters as rational actors who update their party affiliations based on a Bayesian assimilation of new information, Achen (1992) showed that a revisionist model of partyExpand
Diverging Opinions
We commonly observe cases where two people who see the same evidence draw opposite conclusions, and that additional information seems only to polarize them further. One view of this is that itExpand
Partisan Perceptual Bias and the Information Environment
Perceptual bias occurs when beliefs deviate from reality. Democrats and Republicans are thought to be especially susceptible to this type of biased-information processing. And yet we know littleExpand
Money, Time, and Political Knowledge: Distinguishing Quick Recall and Political Learning Skills
Surveys provide widely cited measures of political knowledge. Do seemingly arbitrary features of survey interviews affect their validity? Our answer comes from experiments embedded in aExpand
Democratic Accountability and Retrospective Voting: A Laboratory Experiment
Understanding the incentives of politicians requires understanding the nature of voting behavior. I conduct a laboratory experiment to investigate whether voters focus on the problem of electoralExpand
Sources of Bias in Retrospective Decision Making: Experimental Evidence on Voters’ Limitations in Controlling Incumbents
Are citizens competent to assess the performance of incumbent politicians? Observational studies cast doubt on voter competence by documenting several biases in retrospective assessments ofExpand
Is Voter Competence Good for Voters?: Information, Rationality, and Democratic Performance
A long research tradition in behavioral political science evaluates the performance of democracy by examining voter competence. This literature got its start arguing that voters' lack of informationExpand