Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning

@article{Pennycook2019LazyNB,
  title={Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning},
  author={Gordon Pennycook and David G. Rand},
  journal={Cognition},
  year={2019},
  volume={188},
  pages={39-50}
}

Figures and Tables from this paper

Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines.
TLDR
The data suggest that, in the context of fake news, deliberation facilitates accurate belief formation and not partisan bias.
Who Falls for Fake News? The Roles of Bullshit Receptivity, Overclaiming, Familiarity, and Analytic Thinking
Objective: Fake news represents a particularly egregious and direct avenue by which inaccurate beliefs have been propagated via social media. We investigate the psychological profile of individuals
Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking.
TLDR
The results suggest that belief in fake news may be driven, to some extent, by a general tendency to be overly accepting of weak claims, which may be partly responsible for the prevalence of epistemically suspect beliefs writ large.
Beyond “fake news”: Analytic thinking and the detection of false and hyperpartisan news headlines
Why is misleading partisan content believed and shared? An influential account posits that political partisanship pervasively biases reasoning, such that engaging in analytic thinking exacerbates
Prior Exposure Increases Perceived Accuracy of Fake News
TLDR
It is shown that even a single exposure increases subsequent perceptions of accuracy, both within the same session and after a week, and that social media platforms help to incubate belief in blatantly false news stories and that tagging such stories as disputed is not an effective solution to this problem.
The Impact of Political Sophistication and Motivated Reasoning on Misinformation
ABSTRACT The debate around political misinformation is gaining increasing relevance among the general and academic audience. If a large body of work is devoted to understanding the mechanisms of
You are fake news: political bias in perceptions of fake news
Although the rise of fake news is posing an increasing threat to societies worldwide, little is known about what associations the term ‘fake news’ activates in the public mind. Here, we report a
Partisanship: the true ally of fake news? A comparative analysis of the effect on belief and spread
Introduction: After the recomposition of the Portuguese parliament with the emergence of the radical right, this study explores the influence of partisan orientation on the belief and dissemination
Conservatives’ susceptibility to political misperceptions
TLDR
It is confirmed that conservatives have lower sensitivity than liberals, performing worse at distinguishing truths and falsehoods, and the problem is exacerbated by liberals’ tendency to experience bigger improvements in sensitivity as the proportion of partisan news increases.
Nevertheless, partisanship persisted: fake news warnings help briefly, but bias returns with time
TLDR
This study tested three versions of fake news labels and found that warnings do have an important immediate impact and may work well in the short term, though the durability of that protection is limited.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 103 REFERENCES
Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking.
TLDR
The results suggest that belief in fake news may be driven, to some extent, by a general tendency to be overly accepting of weak claims, which may be partly responsible for the prevalence of epistemically suspect beliefs writ large.
Prior Exposure Increases Perceived Accuracy of Fake News
TLDR
It is shown that even a single exposure increases subsequent perceptions of accuracy, both within the same session and after a week, and that social media platforms help to incubate belief in blatantly false news stories and that tagging such stories as disputed is not an effective solution to this problem.
Selective exposure to misinformation: Evidence from the consumption of fake news during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign
Though some warnings about online “echo chambers” have been hyperbolic, tendencies toward selective exposure to politically congenial content are likely to extend to misinformation and to be
At Least Bias Is Bipartisan: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of Partisan Bias in Liberals and Conservatives
TLDR
A meta-analyzed of 51 experimental studies that examined one form of partisan bias found the pattern to be consistent across a number of different methodological variations and political topics.
The Partisan Brain: An Identity-Based Model of Political Belief
Ideology, Motivated Reasoning, and Cognitive Reflection: An Experimental Study
Social psychologists have identified various plausible sources of ideological polarization over climate change, gun violence, national security, and like societal risks. This paper describes a study
The Affective Tipping Point: Do Motivated Reasoners Ever “Get It”?
In order to update candidate evaluations voters must acquire information and determine whether that new information supports or opposes their candidate expectations. Normatively, new negative
The cognitive reflection test is robust to multiple exposures
TLDR
It is speculated that the CRT remains robust after multiple exposures because less reflective (more intuitive) individuals fail to realize that being presented with apparently easy problems more than once confers information about the task’s actual difficulty.
Reasons and the “ Motivated Numeracy Effect ”
Does the ability to reason well make one less likely to engage in motivated reasoning? Following a paradigm used by Kahan, Peters, Dawson, and Slovic (2013), this study aims to replicate, extend, and
Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection
Decision scientists have identified various plausible sources of ideological polarization over climate change, gun violence, national security, and like issues that turn on empirical evidence. This
...
1
2
3
4
5
...