Lawyers, Power, and Strategic Expertise

@inproceedings{Shanahan2015LawyersPA,
  title={Lawyers, Power, and Strategic Expertise},
  author={Colleen F. Shanahan and Anna E. Carpenter and Alyx Mark},
  year={2015}
}
This empirical study analyzes the experience of the parties described above, specifically the power, representation, and strategic expertise they bring to a dispute. Our analysis of these factors clarifies how representation may be a solution to the access to justice crisis. We find that a representative helps most parties most of the time. We also find that the other party’s representation and the representative’s strategic expertise are significant factors for understanding representation for… Expand
Trial and Error: Lawyers and Nonlawyer Advocates
Nonlawyer advocates are one proposed solution to the access to justice crisis. Theory and research suggest that nonlawyers might be effective, yet scholars know very little, empirically, aboutExpand
Underestimating the unrepresented: Cognitive biases disadvantage pro se litigants in family law cases.
The majority of civil cases in the United States involve at least one pro se party—more often than not, at least 1 litigant is unrepresented by legal counsel. Despite efforts to provide pro seExpand
Not Just the Luck of the Draw? Exploring Competency of Counsel and Other Qualitative Factors in Federal Court Refugee Leave Determinations (2005-2010)
Refugee claimants who have received a negative decision from the Immigration and Refugee Board sometimes seek judicial treview at the Federal Court in Canada. Previous statistical studies, inExpand
The Signaling Effect of Pro se Status
When claimants press their claims without counsel, they fail at virtually every stage of civil litigation and overwhelmingly fail to obtain meaningful access to justice. This research programExpand
(Un)Changing Rates of Pro Se Litigation in Federal Court
There is widespread concern among scholars, court actors, and policy makers that the number of pro se litigants is increasing. However, we have little empirical evidence of the scope of pro seExpand
Trois nuances de l’expertise stratégique : le rôle des avocats dans la procédure d’asile
Au cours de la dernière décennie, les juristes ont documenté de façon régulière les disparités dans les taux de reconnaissance du statut de réfugié, concluant que le facteur déterminant est moins leExpand

References

Improving the Lives of Individuals in Financial Distress Using a Randomized Control Trial: A Research and Clinical Approach
TLDR
The aim of the RCT is to evaluate the effectiveness of two interventions often proposed to help individuals in financial distress improve their financial health, and to demystify the process for scholars, legal aid lawyers, and clinical professors who have not had direct experience with empirical methods to think about conducting RCT evaluations of their own programs. Expand