Law and Economics and A. W. Brian Simpson

@article{Coase1996LawAE,
  title={Law and Economics and A. W. Brian Simpson},
  author={Ronald H. Coase},
  journal={The Journal of Legal Studies},
  year={1996},
  volume={25},
  pages={103 - 119}
}
  • R. Coase
  • Published 1 January 1996
  • Economics
  • The Journal of Legal Studies
THE subject of law and economics when it started in the 1960s presented a difficult problem for the lawyers and economists who had an interest in it. Most lawyers were unfamiliar with the approach of economists and with the concepts they employ. Most economists knew little about the detailed working of the legal system and inevitably found the legal literature difficult to understand because of their unfamiliarity with its vocabulary and its doctrines. That this was the case is quite… 

POSNER, ECONOMICS AND THE LAW: FROM “LAW AND ECONOMICS” TO AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF LAW

The purpose of this article is to discuss Posner's economic analysis of law and to analyse the differences between his economic analysis of law and law and economics. We propose and demonstrate a

Law, economics and Calabresi on the future of law and economics

There exists a distinction between ‘law and economics’ and the ‘economic analysis of law’. The former, corresponding to Coase’s approach, consists in taking legal rules into account insofar as they

An Austrian approach to law and economics, with special reference to superstition

This paper has two purposes. First, it considers what the components of an “Austrian” law and economics might consist of. I argue that Ronald Coase’s conception of law and economics precludes the

Law and the Economy: An Introduction to Coasian Law and Economics

  • Ning Wang
  • Economics, Law
    Man and the Economy
  • 2018
Abstract Ronald Coase was a founding father of modern law and economics. Yet, Coase distanced himself from the economic analysis of law, which today dominates the law and economics scholarship, and

Justice Without Romance. The History of the Economic Analyses of Judges Behavior – 1960–1993

Richard Posner's "What Do Judges and Justices Maximize?" (1993a) is not, as usually believed, the first analysis of judges' behaviors made by using the assumption that judges are rational and

Law, Economics, and Evolutionary Theory: State of the Art and Interdisciplinary Perspectives

This paper is the introduction essay to an edited collection entitled “Law, Economics, and Evolutionary Theory”, forthcoming with Edward Elgar. The volume brings together work by legal scholars,

JUSTICE WITHOUT ROMANCE: THE HISTORY OF THE ECONOMIC ANALYSES OF JUDGES’ BEHAVIOR, 1960–1993

Richard Posner’s “What Do Judges and Justices Maximize?” (1993b) is not, as usually believed, the first analysis of judges’ behaviors made by using the assumption that judges are rational and

From the Firm to Economic Policy: The Problem of Coase's Cost

One of Ronald Coase's insights was to extend the economic theory of choice to include the policy choice among institutional arrangements, which had to be analyzed with the same framework as the

A MINI-SYMPOSIUM ON EARLY LAW AND ECONOMICS: INTRODUCTION

To introduce these articles on early ‘‘law and economics,’’ let us begin with modern ‘‘law and economics,’’ not to add but precisely to avoid new labels and limit our discussion to the basic approach

‘The fugitive’: The figure of the judge in Coase's economics

Abstract: ‘The Problem of Social Cost’ (Coase, 1960) asserts a normative role for the common law judge, that of taking into account the economic consequences of his decisions in allocating property