Large uncertainty in carbon uptake potential of land‐based climate‐change mitigation efforts

@article{Krause2018LargeUI,
  title={Large uncertainty in carbon uptake potential of land‐based climate‐change mitigation efforts},
  author={Andreas Krause and Thomas A. M. Pugh and Anita D. Bayer and Wei Li and Felix Leung and Alberte Bondeau and Jonathan C. Doelman and Florian Humpen{\"o}der and Peter Anthoni and Benjamin Leon Bodirsky and Philippe Ciais and Christoph M{\"u}ller and Guillermo N. Murray-Tortarolo and Stefan Olin and Alexander Popp and Stephen A. Sitch and Elke Stehfest and Almut Arneth},
  journal={Global Change Biology},
  year={2018},
  volume={24},
  pages={3025 - 3038}
}
Most climate mitigation scenarios involve negative emissions, especially those that aim to limit global temperature increase to 2°C or less. However, the carbon uptake potential in land‐based climate change mitigation efforts is highly uncertain. Here, we address this uncertainty by using two land‐based mitigation scenarios from two land‐use models (IMAGE and MAgPIE) as input to four dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs; LPJ‐GUESS, ORCHIDEE, JULES, LPJmL). Each of the four combinations of… 

Tables from this paper

A regional assessment of land‐based carbon mitigation potentials: Bioenergy, BECCS, reforestation, and forest management
Land‐based solutions are indispensable features of most climate mitigation scenarios. Here we conduct a novel cross‐sectoral assessment of regional carbon mitigation potential by running an ecosystem
Global consequences of afforestation and bioenergy cultivation on ecosystem service indicators
Abstract. Land management for carbon storage is discussed as being indispensable for climate change mitigation because of its large potential to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and to
Modelled land use and land cover change emissions – a spatio-temporal comparison of different approaches
Abstract. Quantifying the net carbon flux from land use and land cover changes (fLULCC) is critical for understanding the global carbon cycle and, hence, to support climate change mitigation.
Bioenergy for climate change mitigation: Scale and sustainability
Many global climate change mitigation pathways presented in IPCC assessment reports rely heavily on the deployment of bioenergy, often used in conjunction with carbon capture and storage. We review
Impact of bioenergy crop expansion on climate–carbon cycle feedbacks in overshoot scenarios
Abstract. Stringent mitigation pathways frame the deployment of second-generation bioenergy crops combined with carbon capture and storage (CCS) to generate negative CO2 emissions. This bioenergy
Potential strong contribution of future anthropogenic land-use and land-cover change to the terrestrial carbon cycle
Anthropogenic land-use and land cover changes (LULCC) affect global climate and global terrestrial carbon (C) cycle. However, relatively few studies have quantified the impacts of future LULCC on
Impact of bioenergy crops expansion on climate-carbon cycle feedbacks in overshoot scenarios
Abstract. Stringent mitigation pathways frame the deployment of second-generation bioenergy crops combined with Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) to generate negative CO2 emissions. This Bioenergy
Global ecosystems and fire: Multi‐model assessment of fire‐induced tree‐cover and carbon storage reduction
TLDR
This study uses simulations from seven global vegetation models to provide the first multi-model estimate of fire impacts on global tree cover and the carbon cycle under current climate and anthropogenic land use conditions, averaged for the years 2001-2012, and considers the here presented results to be the current best estimate of global fire effects on ecosystems.
Global cooling induced by biophysical effects of bioenergy crop cultivation
TLDR
After 50 years of large-scale bioenergy crop cultivation following plausible scenarios, global air temperature decreases by 0.03~0.08 °C, with strong regional contrasts and interannual variability, and new metrics are called for to take the biophysical effects into account when assessing the climate mitigation capacity of BECCS.
Constraints and enablers for increasing carbon storage in the terrestrial biosphere
Harnessing nature-based climate solutions (NbCS) to help simultaneously achieve climate and conservation goals is an attractive win-win. The contribution of NbCS to climate action relies on both
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 134 REFERENCES
Global consequences of afforestation and bioenergy cultivation on ecosystem service indicators
Abstract. Land management for carbon storage is discussed as being indispensable for climate change mitigation because of its large potential to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and to
Economic and ecological views on climate change mitigation with bioenergy and negative emissions
Climate stabilization scenarios emphasize the importance of land‐based mitigation to achieve ambitious mitigation goals. The stabilization scenarios informing the recent IPCC's Fifth Assessment
Investigating afforestation and bioenergy CCS as climate change mitigation strategies
The land-use sector can contribute to climate change mitigation not only by reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, but also by increasing carbon uptake from the atmosphere and thereby creating
Historical carbon dioxide emissions caused by land-use changes are possibly larger than assumed
The terrestrial biosphere absorbs about 20% of fossil-fuel CO2 emissions. The overall magnitude of this sink is constrained by the difference between emissions, the rate of increase in atmospheric
Trade‐offs for food production, nature conservation and climate limit the terrestrial carbon dioxide removal potential
TLDR
The most promising avenue for effective tCDR seems to be improvement of efficient carbon utilization pathways, changes in dietary trends or the restoration of marginal lands for the implementation of tC DR.
Impact of tropical land‐use change on soil organic carbon stocks – a meta‐analysis
Land‐use changes are the second largest source of human‐induced greenhouse gas emission, mainly due to deforestation in the tropics and subtropics. CO2 emissions result from biomass and soil organic
Simulated carbon emissions from land-use change are substantially enhanced by accounting for agricultural management
It is over three decades since a large terrestrial carbon sink ( S T ) was fi rst reported. The magnitude of the net sink is now relatively well known, and its importance for dampening atmospheric CO
Uncertainties in the land use flux resulting from land use change reconstructions and gross land transitions
Abstract. Land-use and land-cover (LUC) changes are a key uncertainty when attributing changes in measured atmospheric CO2 concentration to its sinks and sources and must also be much better
Land-use transition for bioenergy and climate stabilization: model comparison of drivers, impacts and interactions with other land use based mitigation options
In this article, we evaluate and compare results from three integrated assessment models (GCAM, IMAGE, and ReMIND/MAgPIE) regarding the drivers and impacts of bioenergy production on the global land
...
...