Laparoscopic management of large hiatus hernia: five-year cohort study and comparison of mesh-augmented versus standard crura repair

@article{Asti2016LaparoscopicMO,
  title={Laparoscopic management of large hiatus hernia: five-year cohort study and comparison of mesh-augmented versus standard crura repair},
  author={Emanuele Asti and Andrea Lovece and Luigi Bonavina and Pamela Milito and Andrea Sironi and Gianluca Bonitta and Stefano Siboni},
  journal={Surgical Endoscopy},
  year={2016},
  volume={30},
  pages={5404-5409}
}
To evaluate objective and subjective outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernia, either with or without resorbable mesh augmentation. The primary outcome of the study was anatomical recurrence rate as measured by endoscopy. Secondary outcomes were safety, efficacy, and long-term quality of life. This was an observational cohort study. Patients who underwent laparoscopic repair of large (≥5 cm) type III hiatal hernia were included. Criteria of exclusion were… CONTINUE READING
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 7 times over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS
7 Citations
21 References
Similar Papers

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 21 references

a 28-case series

  • RJ Stadlhuber, AE Sherif, SK Mittal, RJ JrFitzgibbons, ML Brunt, closure Hunter JG et al Mesh complications after prostheti hiatal
  • Surg Endosc 23(6):1219–1226 Surg Endosc
  • 2016

a survey of SAGES members

  • CT Frantzides, MA Carlson, mesh Loizides S et al Hiatal hernia repair with
  • Surg Endosc 24:1017–1024 5408 Surg Endosc
  • 2016
1 Excerpt

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…