• DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-050003
• Corpus ID: 5639861

Laparoscopic and Partial Nephrectomy

@article{Novick2004LaparoscopicAP,
  title={Laparoscopic and Partial Nephrectomy},
  author={Andrew C. Novick},
  journal={Clinical Cancer Research},
  year={2004},
  volume={10},
  pages={6322S - 6327S}
}

• A. Novick
• Published 15 September 2004
• Medicine
• Clinical Cancer Research

Radical nephrectomy is the gold standard curative operation for patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Since its introduction in 1990, laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is being increasingly done at numerous institutions worldwide. In the hands of experienced laparoscopic urological surgeons and with adherence to established principles of open radical nephrectomy, laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is now a standard of care for patients with T1–3a N0 M0 RCC. Intermediate-term outcome data indicate equivalent cancer-free survival to open radical nephrectomy in such cases. Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) is now an established approach for patients with localized RCC when there is a clinically relevant need to preserve renal function. NSS is also indicated in patients with a single, small, unilateral, localized RCC when the opposite kidney is completely normal. The technical success rate with NSS for RCC is excellent, and long-term patient survival free of cancer is comparable with that obtained after radical nephrectomy. We recently reviewed the results of NSS in 107 patients with localized sporadic RCC treated at the Cleveland Clinic before 1988 who were followed up for a minimum of 10 years. Long-term preservation of renal function was achieved in 93% of patients, and the 10-year cancer specific survival rate was 73%. Although open surgical partial nephrectomy remains the gold standard for nephron-sparing treatment of RCC, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is now available in selected cases. The optimal indications for laparoscopic NSS are in patients with a relatively small and peripheral renal tumor. In such cases, laparoscopic NSS is proving to be an effective, minimally invasive therapeutic approach with respect to renal functional outcome, with additional advantages of reduced postoperative narcotic use, earlier hospital discharge, and a faster convalescence. The laparoscopic approach is associated with longer warm renal ischemia time, more major intraoperative complications, and more postoperative urological complications. Continued efforts are required to develop laparoscopic renal hypothermia techniques and to facilitate intrarenal suturing while minimizing the warm ischemia time.