Land for Peace in Nagorny Karabakh? Political Geographies and Public Attitudes Inside a Contested De Facto State

@article{Toal2013LandFP,
  title={Land for Peace in Nagorny Karabakh? Political Geographies and Public Attitudes Inside a Contested De Facto State},
  author={G. Toal and J. O'loughlin},
  journal={Territory, Politics, Governance},
  year={2013},
  volume={1},
  pages={158 - 182}
}
Abstract Discussions of the territorial conflict over Nagorny Karabakh often fail to convey the multiple political geographies at play in the dispute. This paper outlines six distinct political geographies—territorial regimes and geographical imaginations—that are important in understanding Armenian perspectives on the conflict only (Azerbaijani perspectives are the subject of ongoing research). It presents the results of a 2011 social survey in Nagorny Karabakh that measures the extent of… Expand
27 Citations
The Logic of Occupation in the Nagorno-Karabakh War: The Cases of Agdam and Shaumyan
Imagined communities and practiced geopolitics
  • 2
  • PDF
De Facto States and Democracy: The Case of Abkhazia
  • 11
  • PDF
Shifting the Territory of Politics
  • 6
...
1
2
3
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 46 REFERENCES
The Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict in Light of Polls in Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh
  • 1
Why Autonomy? The Making of Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region 1918–1925
  • 12
  • Highly Influential
  • PDF
Remaking the Nagorno-Karabakh Peace Process
  • 28
National Claims to Territory in the Modern State System: Geographical Considerations
  • 62
The Kurds of Soviet Azerbaijan, 1920-91
  • 12
Black Garden: Armenia and Azerbaijan Through Peace and War
  • 239
Ethnocracy: Land and Identity Politics in Israel/Palestine
  • 423
...
1
2
3
4
5
...