Land for Peace in Nagorny Karabakh? Political Geographies and Public Attitudes Inside a Contested De Facto State

  title={Land for Peace in Nagorny Karabakh? Political Geographies and Public Attitudes Inside a Contested De Facto State},
  author={Gerard Toal and John O’Loughlin},
  journal={Territory, Politics, Governance},
  pages={158 - 182}
Abstract Discussions of the territorial conflict over Nagorny Karabakh often fail to convey the multiple political geographies at play in the dispute. This paper outlines six distinct political geographies—territorial regimes and geographical imaginations—that are important in understanding Armenian perspectives on the conflict only (Azerbaijani perspectives are the subject of ongoing research). It presents the results of a 2011 social survey in Nagorny Karabakh that measures the extent of… 

Cartographies of Consensus and Grievance: Visualising the Territory of Azerbaijan

Abstract Azerbaijan is a state both confronting protracted minority group secessionism and culturally associated with large co-ethnic minority groups in neighbouring states. This context has

The Logic of Occupation in the Nagorno-Karabakh War: The Cases of Agdam and Shaumyan

The thesis presents the circumstances and rationales provided by the Armenian leaders for these counter-intuitive policies of occupation they pursued during the Karabakh war.

The rise and fall of “Novorossiya”: examining support for a separatist geopolitical imaginary in southeast Ukraine

Abstract In the spring of 2014, some anti-Maidan protestors in southeast Ukraine, in alliance with activists from Russia, agitated for the creation of a large separatist entity on Ukrainian

Montage space: Borderlands, micronations, terra nullius, and the imperialism of the geographical imagination

This article extends work in human geography on thinking space relationally and topological space, arguing for a relational conceptualization of space that employs montage in small seemingly confined

Political Institutions in the Post-Soviet De Facto States in Comparison: Abkhazia and Nagorno-Karabakh

The contribution focuses on the political institutions in two post-Soviet de facto states—Abkhazia and Nagorno-Karabakh—which are treated as competitive authoritarian regimes. In this type of

Imagined communities and practiced geopolitics

Political geographers have done a lot of work on both 'nationalism' and 'geopolitics' but they have by no means been the only users of these terms. Based on the massive data-set collected by Google's

Legitimizing the Separatist Cause: Nation-building in the Eurasian de facto States

This article compares the nation-building processes in four well-established Eurasian de facto states. Although all four pursue a set of identity politics that would legitimize the separatist

De Facto States and Democracy: The Case of Abkhazia

Abstract De-facto states constitute an interesting and important anomaly in the international system of sovereign states. No matter how successful and efficient in the administration of their

Land for peace: can territorial adjustments bring about recognition of self-determination claims?

ABSTRACT De facto states represent an anomalous sovereign condition. Their parent states are unable to regain control over the territory that de facto states possess, while the de facto states are

Inside the post-Soviet de facto states: a comparison of attitudes in Abkhazia, Nagorny Karabakh, South Ossetia, and Transnistria

In the wake of the Ukrainian crisis in 2013–2014, renewed attention has been given to the earlier so-called “frozen conflicts” of the successor states of the Soviet Union. In Georgia, Moldova, and



The Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict in Light of Polls in Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh

Ethno-territorial conflicts, such as the dispute over Nagorno-Karabakh, are deeply entrenched in society, rendering diplomacy at the state level insufficient. This is particularly true of the NK

Why Autonomy? The Making of Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region 1918–1925

Abstract Mountainous Karabakh—an Armenian-populated area within Elizavetpol’ guberniya with a Turkic majority—became a source of dispute between Armenia and Azerbaijan after the collapse of the

Remaking the Nagorno-Karabakh Peace Process

The unresolved conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh continues to be the gravest long-term problem for the South Caucasus region and the whole area between the Black and Caspian Seas. Should the conflict

National Claims to Territory in the Modern State System: Geographical Considerations

Recent research has focused on the efforts of national leaders to legitimize and strengthen national identity through the construction of uncomplicated, linear national histories. Paralleling, and in

The Kurds of Soviet Azerbaijan, 1920-91

This article studies the history of the Kurds of Soviet Azerbaijan, with special focus on the controversies surrounding so-called ‘Red Kurdistan’, an entity often supposed to have been a Kurdish

After the Wars in the South Caucasus State of Georgia: Economic Insecurities and Migration in the "De Facto" States of Abkhazia and South Ossetia

Two noted political geographers examine the results of surveys in the "de facto" states of Abkhazia and South Ossetia conducted in 2010. They assess the migration intentions of their residents, the

Accounting for separatist sentiment in Bosnia-Herzegovina and the North Caucasus of Russia: a comparative analysis of survey responses

Abstract A tenet of modern studies of nationalism is that mobilized nations will want to live separately from members of other groups to achieve ethno-territorial goals. A comparison of attitudes to

Black Garden: Armenia and Azerbaijan Through Peace and War

"Black Garden" is the definitive study of how Armenia and Azerbaijan, two southern Soviet republics, got sucked into a conflict that helped bring them to independence, bringing to an end the Soviet

Ethnocracy: Land and Identity Politics in Israel/Palestine

Preface PART I. SETTINGS 1. Introduction 2. The Ethnocratic Regime: The Politics of Seizing Contested Territory PART II. ETHNOCRACY AND TERRITORY IN ISRAEL/PALESTINE 3. Zionist and Palestinian