Lack of involvement of medical writers and the pharmaceutical industry in publications retracted for misconduct: a systematic, controlled, retrospective study

@article{Woolley2011LackOI,
  title={Lack of involvement of medical writers and the pharmaceutical industry in publications retracted for misconduct: a systematic, controlled, retrospective study},
  author={Karen L. Woolley and Rebecca A. Lew and Serina Stretton and Julie A. Ely and Narelle J. Bramich and Janelle R. Keys and Julie A. Monk and Mark J. Woolley},
  journal={Current Medical Research and Opinion},
  year={2011},
  volume={27},
  pages={1175 - 1182}
}
Abstract Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to quantify how many publications retracted because of misconduct involved declared medical writers (i.e., not ghostwriters) or declared pharmaceutical industry support. The secondary objective was to investigate factors associated with misconduct retractions. Design: A systematic, controlled, retrospective, bibliometric study. Data source: Retracted publications dataset in the MEDLINE database. Data selection: PubMed was searched… 
Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: a systematic, retrospective study
TLDR
This is the first study to demonstrate that publications retracted for plagiarism are significantly associated with first authors affiliated with lower-income countries, and have implications for developing appropriate evidence-based strategies and allocation of resources to help mitigate plagiarism misconduct.
The impact of misconduct on the published medical and non-medical literature, and the news media
TLDR
This study examines various trends among 2,375 articles retracted due to misconduct in all scholarly fields and finds the higher rate of plagiarism among authors from non-English speaking countries may diminish if institutions improved their support for the writing of English manuscripts by their scholars.
Professional medical writing support and the quality, ethics and timeliness of clinical trial reporting: a systematic review
TLDR
This systematic review of eight observational studies suggests that PMWS increases the overall quality of reporting of clinical trials and may improve the timeliness of publication.
Professional medical writing support and the quality, ethics and timeliness of clinical trial reporting: a systematic review
TLDR
This systematic review of eight observational studies suggests that PMWS is positively associated with measures of overall quality of reporting of clinical trials and may improve the timeliness of publication.
A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature
TLDR
The scope and characteristics of retracted articles across the full spectrum of scholarly disciplines were surveyed, and 15 prolific individuals accounted for more than half of all retractions due to alleged research misconduct, and strongly influenced all retraction characteristics.
Author attitudes to professional medical writing support
TLDR
Responses to this survey were generally accepting of medical writing assistance and valued many aspects of the role, in particular editorial support, and the services most valued were editing and journal styling, conformity with reporting guidelines and manuscript submissions.
Knowledge and attitudes of Indian surgeons regarding professional medical writing support
TLDR
There was poor awareness and great interest in hiring PMWs, and it might be beneficial to increase the awareness of clinicians about the scientific expertise and communication skills of PMWs and how they can add value to biomedical publications.
Systematic review on the primary and secondary reporting of the prevalence of ghostwriting in the medical literature
TLDR
Evidence for the prevalence of ghostwriting in the medical literature is limited, can be outdated, misleading or mistaken and should not be confused with other unethical authorship practices.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 39 REFERENCES
Phenomena of retraction: reasons for retraction and citations to the publications.
TLDR
Retracted articles continue to be cited as valid work in the biomedical literature after publication of the retraction; these citations signal potential problems for biomedical science.
European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publications
TLDR
Ethical standards for professional medical writers who prepare papers for publication in medical journals are defined, stressing the importance of respecting widely recognised authorship criteria and in particular of ensuring that those listed as named authors have full control of the content of papers.
Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
  • R. Steen
  • Medicine
    Journal of Medical Ethics
  • 2010
TLDR
Levels of misconduct appear to be higher than in the past, which may reflect either a real increase in the incidence of fraud or a greater effort on the part of journals to police the literature.
Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review.
TLDR
Original, quantitative studies on the extent, impact, and management of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research are reviewed to show a statistically significant association between industry sponsorship and pro-industry conclusions.
Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case
TLDR
The Poehlman case illustrates the problems associated with carrying out the duties of an editor when someone alleges misconduct, the responsible author's institution refuses to investigate, and no national standard exists.
Origin and funding of the most frequently cited papers in medicine: database analysis
TLDR
Academic affiliations remain prominent among the authors of the most frequently cited medical research, but such research is increasingly funded by industry, often exclusively so, suggesting academics may be losing control of the clinical research agenda.
Who did what? (Mis)perceptions about authors' contributions to scientific articles based on order of authorship.
TLDR
It is hypothesized that, in the absence of explicit reporting of authors' contributions to a paper, readers would have variable perceptions of the authors' roles based solely on authorship order.
Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: Writing and editing for biomedical publication
The following information is available to be viewed/ printed in Adobe Acrobat pdf format. I. Statement of Purpose A. About the Uniform Requirements B. Potential Users of the Uniform Requirements C.
Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers.
What Should Be Done To Tackle Ghostwriting in the Medical Literature?
TLDR
This debate examines how best to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature from the perspectives of a researcher, an editor, and the professional medical writer.
...
...