Laboratory environments are not conducive for allopatric speciation

@article{Florin2002LaboratoryEA,
  title={Laboratory environments are not conducive for allopatric speciation},
  author={A. Florin and A. Ödeen},
  journal={Journal of Evolutionary Biology},
  year={2002},
  volume={15}
}
  • A. Florin, A. Ödeen
  • Published 2002
  • Biology
  • Journal of Evolutionary Biology
    • We review published records of laboratory experiments on peripatric and vicariance allopatric speciation to address the following three questions: (1) What was the true effect size of reproductive isolation? (2) Was the reproductive isolation persistent? (3) What influenced the development of isolation? Contrary to popular belief, laboratory evidence for allopatric speciation is quite weak. Assortative mating was only found among derived populations in vicariance experiments. Reproductive… CONTINUE READING
    View on Wiley
    onlinelibrary.wiley.com
    15 Citations
    Background Citations
    5
    Results Citations
    1
    15 Citations
    Citation Type

    Citation Type

    Effects of Post-Glacial Range Expansions and Population Bottlenecks on Species Richness
    • 9
    • PDF
    DIVERGENT ENVIRONMENTS AND POPULATION BOTTLENECKS FAIL TO GENERATE PREMATING ISOLATION IN DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA
    • 17
    Sexual selection and peripatric speciation: the Kaneshiro model revisited
    • 15
    ADAPTATION TO DESICCATION FAILS TO GENERATE PRE‐ AND POSTMATING ISOLATION IN REPLICATE DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER LABORATORY POPULATIONS
    • Lucia Kwan, H. Rundle
    • Biology, Medicine
    • Evolution; international journal of organic evolution
    • 2010
    • 61
    • PDF
    PERSPECTIVE: MODELS OF SPECIATION: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED IN 40 YEARS?
    • S. Gavrilets
    • Biology, Medicine
    • Evolution; international journal of organic evolution
    • 2003
    • 449
    • PDF
    Bacteria-induced sexual isolation in Drosophila
    • 40
    Seafood through time revisited: the Phanerozoic increase in marine trophic resources and its macroevolutionary consequences
    • 34
    Reconciling evolutionary theory and taxonomic practice
    Unintentional genetic processes in artificially maintained populations: Proving the leading role of selection in evolution
    • 8
    • PDF
    Measuring coral reef decline through meta-analyses
    • 147
    • PDF

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 71 REFERENCES
    Effective population size may limit the power of laboratory experiments to demonstrate sympatric and parapatric speciation
    • 27
    LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS ON SPECIATION: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED IN 40 YEARS?
    • 982
    FOUNDER‐FLUSH SPECIATION IN DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA: A LARGE‐SCALE EXPERIMENT
    • 40
    Ecology and the origin of species.
    • D. Schluter
    • Biology, Medicine
    • Trends in ecology & evolution
    • 2001
    • 1,696
    • PDF
    Genetic Revolutions, Founder Effects, and Speciation
    • 612
    SEXUAL ISOLATION, SPECIATION AND THE DIRECTION OF EVOLUTION
    • K. Kaneshiro
    • Biology, Medicine
    • Evolution; international journal of organic evolution
    • 1980
    • 233
    Sympatric speciation in animals: the ugly duckling grows up.
    • S. Via
    • Biology, Medicine
    • Trends in ecology & evolution
    • 2001
    • 776
    • PDF
    “PATTERNS OF SPECIATION IN DROSOPHILA” REVISITED
    • J. Coyne, H. Orr
    • Biology, Medicine
    • Evolution; international journal of organic evolution
    • 1997
    • 751
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    Evolution of Reproductive Isolation in Allopatric and Sympatric Populations
    • 41
    SINGLE FOUNDER‐FLUSH EVENTS AND THE EVOLUTION OF REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION
    • 47
    • Highly Influential