Labor advantages drive the greater productivity of faculty at elite universities

@article{Zhang2022LaborAD,
  title={Labor advantages drive the greater productivity of faculty at elite universities},
  author={Sam Zhang and Kenneth Hunter Wapman and Daniel B. Larremore and Aaron Clauset},
  journal={ArXiv},
  year={2022},
  volume={abs/2204.05989}
}
dominate scientific discourse, with the small proportion of researchers at elite universities producing a disproportionate share of all research publications. Environmental prestige is known to drive such epistemic disparity, but the mechanisms by which it causes increased faculty productivity remain unknown. Here we combine employment, publication, and federal survey data for 78,802 tenure-track faculty at 262 PhD-granting institutions in the American university system between 2008–2017 to show… 

Figures from this paper

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 47 REFERENCES
Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks
TLDR
It is found that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality and increased institutional prestige leads to increased faculty production, better faculty placement, and a more influential position within the discipline.
Quantifying hierarchy and dynamics in U.S. faculty hiring
  • Under review,
  • 2021
Productivity, prominence, and the effects of academic environment
TLDR
The results show that the prestige of faculty’s current work environment, not their training environment, drives their future scientific productivity, while current and past locations drive prominence, indicating a limited role for doctoral prestige in predicting scientific contributions.
Intersectional inequalities in science
TLDR
A large-scale bibliometric analysis of the relationship between intersectional identities, topics, and scientific impact finds homophily between identities and topic, suggesting a relationship between diversity in the scientific workforce and expansion of the knowledge base.
Subfield prestige and gender inequality in computing
TLDR
It is found that subfield prestige correlates with gender inequality, such that faculty working in computing subfields with more women tend to hold positions at less prestigious institutions, and there is no significant evidence of racial or socioeconomic differences by subfield.
The Diversity–Innovation Paradox in Science
TLDR
Demographically underrepresented students innovate at higher rates than majority students, but their novel contributions are discounted and less likely to earn them academic positions, suggesting there may be unwarranted reproduction of stratification in academic careers that discounts diversity’s role in innovation.
Structures of Scientific Collaboration
Economics Departmental Rankings: Research Incentives, Constraints, and Efficiency
The paper has no abstract, but is an early contributor to the literature that ranks economics departments according to the publication performance of affiliated faculty. Additional considerations are
The Great American University: Its Rise to Preeminence, Its Indispensable National Role, Why It Must Be Protected
Although Americas universities have become the envy of the world for their creative energy and their production of transformative knowledge, few understand how and why they have become preeminent.
Rethinking doctoral publication practices: writing from and beyond the thesis
This article addresses the importance of giving greater pedagogical attention to writing for publication in higher education. It recognizes that, while doctoral research is a major source of new
...
...