Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective

@article{Brown2001KnowledgeAO,
  title={Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective},
  author={John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid},
  journal={Organization Science},
  year={2001},
  volume={12},
  pages={198-213}
}
While the recent focus on knowledge has undoubtedly benefited organizational studies, the literature still presents a sharply contrasting and even contradictory view of knowledge, which at times is described as "sticky" and at other times "leaky." This paper is written on the premise that there is more than a problem with metaphors at issue here, and more than accounts of different types of knowledge (such as "tacit" and "explicit") can readily explain. Rather, these contrary descriptions of… Expand
Knowledge and Organization-On knowledge bureaucracies , communities and collectivities
Increasingly, both practitioners and theorists put forward " knowledge " as a deus ex machina for achieving competitiveness. Obviously, in a general sense, all firms or organizations may be said toExpand
Interactive Innovation Processes and the Problems of Managing Knowledge
In the early days of knowledge management both the literature and practice were relatively simplistic in orientation. Knowledge was seen as crucial in securing competitive advantage for allExpand
Knowledge Risks in Organizational Networks: The Practice Perspective
TLDR
It is concluded that, since knowing in practice is emergent and not fully controllable, adopting a set of best practices on how to effectively transfer knowledge could itself be risky for managers who then believe that knowledge can be treated as a commodity and easily moved about a network. Expand
The firm as an epistemic community: The knowledge based view revisited
Based on a sociological conceptualization of knowledge as residing in groups of practitioners, epistemic communities , this article proposes a new perspective within the knowledge-based view of theExpand
Research Utilisation & Knowledge Mobilisation: A Scoping Review of the Literature
Organizational knowledge is much talked about but little understood. In this paper we set out to conceptualize organizational knowledge and explore its implications for knowledge management. We takeExpand
Trust and betrayal in Knowledge Management
Positivist accounts of the KM literature neglect the diverse and socially created nature of knowledge and organizational relations. However, more critical accounts stress a less epidermal approach toExpand
Knowledge sharing in a dispersed network of HR practice: Zooming in on power/knowledge struggles
The practice-based view of knowledge is recognized as an important epistemological perspective in the knowledge management literature. However, there is also a growing awareness that approachesExpand
Evolving knowledge : An exploration of affinities between knowledge management and communities of practice
The concept of Knowledge Management has enjoyed the last few years an extensive and vigorous research by both practitioners and academics. Started as an ambitious effort to understand and manageExpand
"Made with Knowledge" - Disentangling the IT Knowledge Artifact by a Qualitative Literature Review
TLDR
Light is shed on the multiple ways these ideas can inform the “reification” of knowledge into particular IT artifacts, which is called IT Knowledge Artifact (ITKA), and on how seemingly irreconcilable positions can contribute in the design of these computational artifact supporting knowledge work in organizations. Expand
Managing the KM Trade-Off: Knowledge Centralization versus Distribution
TLDR
The paper introduces the two major views on knowledge ­objectivist, subjectivist - and explodes each of them into two major approaches to KM: knowledge as a market, and knowledge as intellectual capital (the objectivistic perspective); knowledge as mental models, andknowledge as practice (the subjectivist perspective). Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 121 REFERENCES
The firm as a distributed knowledge system : A constructionist approach
TLDR
Firms are distributed knowledge systems in a strong sense: they are decentered systems, iacking an overseeing 'mind'; the knowledge they need to draw upon is inherently indeterminate and continually emerging. Expand
Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology
How should we understand why firms exist? A prevailing view has been that they serve to keep in check the transaction costs arising from the self-interested motivations of individuals. We develop inExpand
What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning
Firms are organizations that represent social knowledge of coordination and learning. But why should their boundaries demarcate quantitative shifts in the knowledge and capability of their members?Expand
Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing
Bridgin Epistemologies: The Generative Dance between Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing - Much current work on organizational knowledge, intellectual capital, knowledge-creatingExpand
Information Acumen: The Understanding and Use of Knowledge in Modern Business
From the Publisher: The present period has been called the Information Age. Until now, however, historians have by and large passed over the use and generation of business information. ThisExpand
Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation
Recent ethnographic studies of workplace practices indicate that the ways people actually work usually differ fundamentally from the ways organizations describe that work in manuals, trainingExpand
How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation
Japanese companies have become successful because of their skill and expertise at creating organizational knowledge. Organizational knowledge is not only the creation of new knowledge, but alsoExpand
Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances
This research examines the role played by the ‘causally ambiguous’ nature of knowledge in the process of knowledge transfer between strategic alliance partners. Based on a cross‐sectional sample ofExpand
Culture and Organizational Learning
Traditionally, theories of organizational learning have taken one of two approaches that share a common characterization of learning but differ in focus. One approach focuses on learning byExpand
Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation
From the Publisher: Why are some companies better at innovation than others? Drawing on the candid reflections of managers at leading technology-based companies such as Hewlett-Packard, ChaparralExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...