Knowledge, Belief and Counterfactual Reasoning in Games

  title={Knowledge, Belief and Counterfactual Reasoning in Games},
  author={Robert Stalnaker},
  journal={Economics and Philosophy},
  pages={133 - 163}
  • Robert Stalnaker
  • Published 1 October 1996
  • Philosophy, Economics
  • Economics and Philosophy
Deliberation about what to do in any context requires reasoning about what will or would happen in various alternative situations, including situations that the agent knows will never in fact be realized. In contexts that involve two or more agents who have to take account of each others' deliberation, the counterfactual reasoning may become quite complex. When I deliberate, I have to consider not only what the causal effects would be of alternative choices that I might make, but also what… 
Preferences, counterfactuals and maximisation : reasoning in game theory
This thesis explores two kinds of foundational issues in game theory. The first is concerned with the interpretation of the basic structure of a game, especially the definitions of outcomes and
Bayesian Subjunctive Conditionals for Games and Decisions
The theory of rational decision has always been implicitly involved with subjunctive and counterfactual conditionals. “If I were to do A, this would happen; if I were to do B that would happen. ”
Counterfactual reasoning ( philosophical aspects ) — quantitative
(Philosophical Aspects)—Qualitative". Here, after a general introduction and historical overview, we emphasize the role of counterfactual reasoning within the quantitative frameworks of probability
Dynamic Models of Rational Deliberation in Games
  • E. Pacuit
  • Economics
    Models of Strategic Reasoning
  • 2015
The general conclusion is that the rational outcomes of a game depend not only on the structure of the game, but also on the players’ initial beliefs, which dynamical rule is being used by the players to update their inclinations.
Epistemic Foundations of Game Theory
Foundational work in game theory aims at making explicit the assumptions that underlie the basic concepts of the discipline. Non-cooperative game theory is the study of individual, rational decision
Players' beliefs in extensive form games
It is argued that the standard model of an extensive form game rules out an important phenomenon in situations of strategic interaction: deception, and how the model can be generalized to incorporate this phenomenon.
Non-cooperative game theory in biology and cooperative reasoning in humans
An analysis of the process leading to cooperation in terms of rationality concepts, game theory and epistemic logic is developed to understand why cooperation is possible and what kind of reasoning and beliefs would lead to cooperative decision-making.
Common Knowledge of Rationality in Extensive Games
We develop a logical system that captures two different interpretations of what extensive games model, and we apply this to a long-standing debate in game theory between those who defend the claim
Intentions and Strategies in Game-Like Scenarios
This paper investigates the possibility of extending the logics of games with the notion of agents’ intentions (in the sense of Cohen and Levesque’s BDI theory), and proposes a new operator (straσ) that can be used to formalize reasoning about outcomes of strategies in game-like scenarios.


Counterfactuals and Two Kinds of Expected Utility
We begin with a rough theory of rational decision-making. In the first place, rational decision-making involves conditional propositions: when a person weighs a major decision, it is rational for him
Rationalizable Strategic Behavior and the Problem of Perfection
This paper explores the fundamental problem of what can be inferred about the outcome of a noncooperative game, from the rationality of the players and from the information they possess. The answer
The Dynamics Of Rational Deliberation
This chapter discusses Dynamic Deliberation's role in the development of Rational Decision Making, as well as its applications in Game Theory and Rationality.
On the evaluation of solution concepts
It is proposed that solution concepts for games should be evaluated in a way that is analogous to the way a logic is evaluated by a model theory for the language. A solution concept defines a set of
Causation in decision, belief change, and statistics
I / Decisions and Games.- Conditional Preference and Causal Expected Utility.- Causal Decision Theory and Game Theory: A Classic Argument for Equilibrium Solutions, a Defense of Weak Equilibria, and
Causal decision theory
My own version of causal decision theory is given, compared with versions offered by several other authors, and it is suggested that the versions have more in common than meets the eye.
Foundations and Applications of Decision Theory
Policy-Formation with Issue-Processing and Transformation of Issues.- A Diagrammatic Exposition of the Logic of Collective Action.- Decision-Theoretic Analysis of Rawls' Original Position.- The