Knowing with Certainty: The Appropriateness of Extreme Confidence.

  title={Knowing with Certainty: The Appropriateness of Extreme Confidence.},
  author={Baruch Fischhoff and Paul Slovic and Sarah Lichtenstein},
  journal={Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance},
How often are people wrong when they are certain that they know the answer to a question ? The studies reported here suggest that the answer is "too often." For a variety of general-knowledge questions (e.g., absinthe is [a] a liqueur or [b] a precious stone), subjects first chose the most likely answer and then indicated their degree of certainty that the answer they had selected was, in fact, correct. Across several different question and response formats, subjects were consistently… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

When Reality Is Out of Focus: Can People Tell Whether Their Beliefs and Judgments Are Correct or Wrong?

  • A. Koriat
  • Psychology
    Journal of experimental psychology. General
  • 2018
The results imply that the positive C/A relationship that has been reported in many studies is an artifact of OLA being better than chance rather than representing a general ability to discriminate between correct and wrong responses, and support the ecological approach.

Reasons for confidence.

People are often overconfident in evaluating the correctness of their knowledge. The present studies investigated the possibility that assessment of confidence is biased by attempts to justify one's

When confidence in a choice is independent of which choice is made

  • A. Koriat
  • Psychology
    Psychonomic bulletin & review
  • 2008
Results suggested that choice-independent confidence in forced-choice two-alternative general-information questions is mediated by the domain familiarity of the question and by its tendency to bring to mind either few or many thoughts and considerations.

Subjective beliefs and confidence when facts are forgotten

Forgetting can be a salient source of uncertainty for subjective beliefs, confidence, and ambiguity attitudes. To investigate this, we run several experiments where people bet on propositions (facts)

Subjective confidence in one's answers: the consensuality principle.

  • A. Koriat
  • Psychology
    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
  • 2008
The results argue against a direct-access view of confidence judgments and suggest that such judgments will be accurate only as long as people's responses are by and large correct across the sampled items, thus stressing the criticality of a representative design.

Heuristics and Biases: Extensional versus Intuitive Reasoning

The student of judgment uses the probability calculus as a standard of comparison much as a student of perception might compare the perceived size of objects to their physical sizes to determine the “correct” probability of events.

Overconfidence: It Depends on How, What, and Whom You Ask.

Determining why some people, some domains, and some types of judgments are more prone to overconfidence will be important to understanding how confidence judgments are made.

The self-consistency model of subjective confidence.

Simulation and empirical results suggest that response speed is a frugal cue for self-consistency, and its validity depends on the validity of self- Consistency in predicting performance.



Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases

Three heuristics that are employed in making judgements under uncertainty are described: representativeness, availability of instances or scenarios, which is often employed when people are asked to assess the frequency of a class or the plausibility of a particular development.

Calibration of Probabilities: The State of the Art

From the subjectivist point of view (de Finetti, 1937) a probability is a degree of belief in a proposition whose truth has not been ascertained and there is no “right” or “correct” probability that resides somewhere “in reality” against which it can be compared.

Psychology of Reasoning: Structure and Content

'Is there any other point to which you would wish to draw my attention?' 'To the curious incident of the dog in the night-time.' 'The dog did nothing in the night-time.' 'That was the curious

Processes in Acquiring Knowledge

A theory of Socratic tutoring in the form of pattern-action rules for a computer program that accounts for the specific teaching strategies used by the tutors in the dialogues within a content-independent formalism is developed.