Kin and multilevel selection in social evolution: a never-ending controversy?

@article{Kramer2016KinAM,
  title={Kin and multilevel selection in social evolution: a never-ending controversy?},
  author={Jos Kramer and Jo{\"e}l Meunier},
  journal={F1000Research},
  year={2016},
  volume={5}
}
Kin selection and multilevel selection are two major frameworks in evolutionary biology that aim at explaining the evolution of social behaviors. However, the relationship between these two theories has been plagued by controversy for almost half a century and debates about their relevance and usefulness in explaining social evolution seem to rekindle at regular intervals. Here, we first provide a concise introduction into the kin selection and multilevel selection theories and shed light onto… 

Figures from this paper

Controversy in Evolutionary Theory: A multilevel view of the issues
TLDR
This paper is concerned with the issue in the case of vertebrates such as birds, fishes, mammals, and specifically humans, and proposes that the resolution is that adaptive selection outcomes occurring at the organism level chain down to determine outcomes at the genome level.
The other facets of family life and their role in the evolution of animal sociality
  • J. KramerJ. Meunier
  • Biology, Psychology
    Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • 2018
TLDR
It is inferred that the explicit consideration of thus‐far neglected facets of family life, together with their study across the whole diversity of family systems, are crucial to advance the understanding of the processes that shape the evolution of social life.
Kin and group selection are both flawed but useful data analysis tools
TLDR
A quantitative, data-driven approach shows how kin and multilevel selection theory both have substantial room for improvement as tools for understanding social evolution in all branches of life.
Multilevel Selection in Kin Selection Language.
Evaluating kin and group selection theory as tools for analyzing microbial data
TLDR
A quantitative, data-driven approach shows how kin and multilevel selection theory both have substantial room for improvement as tools for understanding social evolution in all branches of life.
Death happy: adaptive ageing and its evolution by kin selection in organisms with colonial ecology
TLDR
Previous adaptive death theory is reviewed, including consumer sacrifice, biomass sacrifice and defensive sacrifice types of altruistic adaptive death, and the term adaptive killing of kin is introduced to describe examples where adaptive death results more from action of kin than from self-destructive mechanisms.
Dispersal behaviour as the outcome and trigger of multilevel selection in a social spider
TLDR
A detailed individual based model is introduced that proposes that the dispersal behaviour of individuals is both the result and the prerequisite of multilevel selection in this species.
Toward a theory of evolution as multilevel learning
TLDR
The correspondence among the key features of evolution, learning dynamics, and renormalizability of physical theories is established to outline a theory of evolution that strives to incorporate all evolutionary processes within a unified mathematical framework of the theory of learning.
Updating Darwin: Information and entropy drive the evolution of life
TLDR
Two mechanisms arise from viewing life as the evolution of information that can resolve paradoxical features of advanced forms of life: cooperation, diversification, and programmed death result from the entropic selection of evolving species.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 171 REFERENCES
Kin Selection and Its Critics
TLDR
This overview of Hamilton's theory of kin selection highlights a number of conceptual issues that lie at the heart of the current debate, and considers the often-strained relationship between the theories of kin and multilevel selection.
Natural selection. VII. History and interpretation of kin selection theory
  • S. Frank
  • Sociology
    Journal of evolutionary biology
  • 2013
TLDR
The history of kin selection theory is described, with emphasis on how the causal perspective improved through the study of key patterns of natural history, such as dispersal and sex ratio, and through a unified approach to demographic and social processes.
Experimental Studies of Group Selection: What Do They Tell US About Group Selection in Nature?
The study of group selection has developed along two autonomous lines. One approach, which we refer to as the adaptationist school, seeks to understand the evolution of existing traits by examining
Social evolution in structured populations.
TLDR
A general condition for social behaviour to be favoured over non-social behaviour is derived, which is applicable in a large class of models for structured populations of fixed size and highlights the crucial importance of identifying the relative scale at which competition occurs.
The Relation between Multilocus Population Genetics and Social Evolution Theory
TLDR
It is shown that the multilocus methodology is conceptually analogous to social evolutionary methodology, which focuses on selection acting on associated individuals, and that this methodology helps solve problems of dynamic sufficiency in social evolution theory.
The genetical theory of social behaviour
  • L. LehmannF. Rousset
  • Biology
    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
  • 2014
TLDR
The population genetic basis of social evolution is surveyed, using a logically consistent set of arguments to cover a wide range of biological scenarios and clarify some persistent divergences within social evolution theory, with respect to exactness, synergies, maximization, dynamic sufficiency and the role of genetic arguments.
Group selection and kin selection: Two concepts but one process
In a recent paper, Traulsen and Nowak use a multilevel selection model to show that cooperation can be favored by group selection in finite populations [Traulsen A, Nowak M (2006) Proc Natl Acad Sci
Alternative formulations of multilevel selection
TLDR
It is argued that the “effect hypothesis” of macroevolution, requiring, in selection among species, both the absence of group effects on organismic fitness (multilevel selection) and the direct determination of species fitnesses by those of organisms, is untestable with paleontological data.
Social semantics: how useful has group selection been?
TLDR
The last 45 years of research provide clear evidence of the relative use of the kin and group selection approaches, whereas there is no formal theory of group selection.
...
...