Justice and personality: Using integrative theories to derive moderators of justice effects ☆

@article{Colquitt2006JusticeAP,
  title={Justice and personality: Using integrative theories to derive moderators of justice effects ☆},
  author={Jason A. Colquitt and Brent A. Scott and Timothy A. Judge and John C. Shaw},
  journal={Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes},
  year={2006},
  volume={100},
  pages={110-127}
}
Abstract Although organizational justice has been shown to have behavioral consequences, there remains a surprising amount of variation in how individuals react to fair and unfair treatment. The present study drew on three integrative theories in the justice literature—fairness heuristic theory, uncertainty management theory, and fairness theory—to identify personality traits that could explain such variation. From these theories, we identified trust propensity, risk aversion, and morality… Expand

Figures and Tables from this paper

Moderating the Interaction Between Procedural Justice and Decision Frame: The Counterbalancing Effect of Personality Traits
TLDR
The results from 363 participants showed that the moderating effects of personality traits counterbalanced the interaction between justice and framing, such that for individuals with high self-efficacy/low trait anxiety, justice effects were larger in negative framing than in positive framing. Expand
The precursors and products of justice climates: Group leader antecedents and employee attitudinal consequences.
Drawing on the organizational justice, organizational climate, leadership and personality, and social comparison theory literatures, we develop hypotheses about the effects of leader personality onExpand
Political skill as a moderator of the relationship between subordinate perceptions of interactional justice and supervisor ratings of interpersonal facilitation
Purpose - – Based on social exchange theory and the norm of reciprocity, interactional justice has been proposed to be an important construct in explaining individual performance. However,Expand
Chapter 9 From justice events to justice climate: A multi-level temporal model of information aggregation and judgment
Purpose – We outline a theoretical model of the emergence of justice climate in groups, teams, and organizations, and in doing so integrate multiple justice perspectives (e.g., affective events,Expand
Are Organizational Justice Effects Bounded by Individual Differences? An Examination of Equity Sensitivity, Exchange Ideology, and the Big Five
This study explored the extent to which two theoretically derived individual differences (equity sensitivity and exchange ideology) moderated the effects of injustice on behavioral reactions.Expand
The Dynamism of Daily Justice: A Person-Environment Fit Perspective on the Situated Value of Justice
Despite the generally positive consequences associated with justice, recent research suggests that supervisors cannot always enact justice, and responses to justice may not be universally positive.Expand
Managing Job Satisfaction: The Mediating Effect of Procedural Fairness
The present study aims to propose and test an integrative model that considers the mediating effect of procedural justice on the relationships between personality traits and job satisfaction (JS).Expand
The personality basis of justice: The five‐factor model as an integrative model of personality and procedural fairness effects on cooperation
Building upon the self‐based model of cooperation (De Cremer & Tyler, 2005), the present study investigates the relationship between the five‐factor model (FFM) and cooperation. Study 1 (N = 56), anExpand
The egocentric nature of procedural justice: Social value orientation as moderator of reactions to decision-making procedures
In four studies, the authors investigated the individual-oriented versus social-oriented nature of procedural justice effects by comparing fairness-based responses to decision-making procedures amongExpand
If you feel bad, it's unfair: a quantitative synthesis of affect and organizational justice perceptions.
TLDR
State and trait positive and negative affect exhibit statistically significant relationships with perceptions of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice in the predicted directions, with mean population-level correlations ranging in absolute magnitude. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 90 REFERENCES
A Deservingness Approach to Respect as a Relationally Based Fairness Judgment
Value judgments, attributional judgments, and self-esteem are predicted to moderate the relationship between respectful treatment and procedural justice. In three studies, the moderation hypothesisExpand
Delay of Gratification as a Moderator of the Procedural Justice Distributive Justice Relationship
The present study examined the hypothesis that procedural justice and distributive justice are positively related. In other words, when individuals perceive fairness in how decisions are made, theyExpand
Toward Understanding the Psychology of Reactions to Perceived Fairness: The Role of Affect Intensity
In social psychology it has been argued that the importance of justice cannot be overstated. In the present paper, we ask whether this indeed is the case and, more precisely, examine when fairness isExpand
Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.
TLDR
It is suggested that although different justice dimensions are moderately to highly related, they contribute incremental variance explained in fairness perceptions and illustrate the overall and unique relationships among distributive, procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice and several organizational outcomes. Expand
The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis
Abstract The correlates of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice were examined using 190 studies samples, totaling 64,757 participants. We found the distinction between the threeExpand
Moral Virtues, Fairness Heuristics, Social Entities, and Other Denizens of Organizational Justice.
Abstract Recent years have seen a burgeoning interest in the study of organizational justice. Employee perceptions of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice have been related to aExpand
The interactive effects of procedural justice and exchange ideology on supervisor‐rated commitment
Matched data collected from 143 employees and their immediate supervisors of a private sector organization indicated that employee perceptions of procedural justice were only related toExpand
Advances in Organizational Justice
SUMMARY As Figure 1.3 illustrates, several important theories of orga-nizational justice can be arrayed in a 2 x 2 matrix. We do not want to imply by this characterization, however, that all fourExpand
To justify or excuse?: A meta-analytic review of the effects of explanations.
TLDR
The authors used R. Folger and R. Cropanzano's fairness theory to derive predictions about the effects of explanation provision and explanation adequacy on justice judgments and cooperation, retaliation, and withdrawal responses and found that explanations were more beneficial when they took the form of excuses rather than justifications. Expand
Locus of Control as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Perceived Influence and Procedural Justice
A survey of 172 employees of a consumer products manufacturing firm was used to test hypotheses about procedural justice. Some reviewers have noted that perceptions of procedural justice are enhancedExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...