Just how controversial is evidential holism?

  title={Just how controversial is evidential holism?},
  author={Joe Morrison},
This paper is an examination of evidential holism, a prominent position in epistemology and the philosophy of science which claims that experiments only ever confirm or refute entire theories. The position is historically associated with W.V. Quine, and it is at once both popular and notorious, as well as being largely under-described. But even though there’s no univocal statement of what holism is or what it does, philosophers have nevertheless made substantial assumptions about its content… 

Indispensability and Holism

It is claimed that the indispensability argument for the existence of mathematical entities (IA) works in a way that allows a proponent of mathematical realism to remain agnostic with regard to how

Quine's 'needlessly strong' holism.

The holistic presumptions of the indispensability argument

It is argued that the apparent removal of holism leaves a lacuna in the indispensability argument because without the holistic premise, or some other premise which facilitates the transfer of evidence to mathematical portions of scientific theories, the argument is implausible.

Evidential Holism and Indispensability Arguments

The indispensability argument is a method for showing that abstract mathematical objects exist (call this mathematical Platonism). Various versions of this argument have been proposed (§1). Lately,

Scientific Realism and the Indispensability Argument for Mathematical Realism: A Marriage Made in Hell

An emphasis on explanatory contribution is central to a recent formulation of the indispensability argument (IA) for mathematical realism. Because scientific realism is argued for by means of

The Gap Problem in Hypothetico-Deductivism

Facing many famous objections, the hypothetico-deductive (H-D) model is no longer the mainstream account of evidence in the philosophy of science. Nevertheless, in the history (and even contemporary

How to Do Things with Theory: The Instrumental Role of Auxiliary Hypotheses in Testing

Pierre Duhem’s influential argument for holism relies on a view of the role that background theory plays in testing: according to this still common account of “auxiliary hypotheses,” elements of

Can the new indispensability argument be saved from Euclidean rescues?

It is argued that a proponent of the version of IA that works without appeal to confirmational holism will struggle to answer a challenge readily answered by proponents of a version ofIA that does appeal to confirmation holism.

The Duhem-Quine problem for equiprobable conjuncts.

Why inference to the best explanation doesn’t secure empirical grounds for mathematical platonism

It is argued that even if inference to the best explanation is cogent, and claims about mathematical entities play an essential explanatory role in some of the authors' best scientific explanations, it doesn’t follow that the empirical phenomena that license those explanations also provide empirical support for the claim that mathematical entities exist.



Main trends in recent philosophy: two dogmas of empiricism.

M ODERN empiricism has been conditioned in large part by two dogmas. One is a belief in some fundamental cleavage between truths which are analytic, or grounded in meanings independently of matters

Theories and Things

Here are the most recent writings, some of them unpublished, of the preeminent philosopher of our time. Philosophical reflections on language are brought to bear upon metaphysical and epistemological

The two dogmas of empiricism

Modern empiricism has been conditioned in large part by two dogmas. One is a belief in some fundamental cleavage between truths which are analytic, or grounded in meanings independently of matters of

Holism About Meaning And About Evidence: In Defence Of W. V. Quine

Holistic claims about evidence are a commonplace inthe philosophy of science; holistic claims aboutmeaning are a commonplace in the philosophy oflanguage. W. V. Quine has advocated both types

In Defense of the Quine-Duhem Thesis: A Reply to Greenwood

While discussing the work of Kuhn and Hanson, John Greenwood (1990) misidentifies the nature of the relationship between the incommensurability of theories and the theory-ladenness of observation.

Holistic Realism: A Response to Katz On Holism and Intuition

In his book, Realistic Rationalism (henceforth RR), and his article, “Mathematics and Metaphilosophy”(henceforth MM), Jerrold Katz develops and defends a philosophy of mathematics that is realist in

Mathematics and Indispensability

Mathematics plays an indispensable role in the explanations that modern science provides of empirical phenomena. From this unexceptionable observation, a controversial philosophical conclusion is

VIII.—An Attempt at a Realistic Interpretation of Experience

INTRODUCTION ‘The task of science’, writes Niels Bohr, ‘is both to extend the range of our experience and to reduce it to order.’ ‘Science’, echoes a modern philosopher, ‘is ultimately intended to

Oxford Studies in Epistemology

1. The Epistemology of Conditionals 2. A Defense of Dogmatism 3. Rational Agnosticism and Degrees of Belief 4. Probability and Prodigality 5. Essence and Natural Kinds: When Science Meets Preschooler

Relevant deduction

This paper presents an outline of a new theory of relevant deduction which arose from the purpose of solving paradoxes in various fields of analytic philosophy. In distinction to relevance logics,