Judicial public relations: Determinants of press release publication by constitutional courts

@article{Meyer2019JudicialPR,
  title={Judicial public relations: Determinants of press release publication by constitutional courts},
  author={Philip N. Meyer},
  journal={Politics},
  year={2019},
  volume={40},
  pages={477 - 493}
}
It remains unclear what institutional characteristics determine the publication of press releases by constitutional courts. Research has revealed that courts use press releases to disseminate information; however, little is known about when exactly courts choose to publish a press release on a ruling. By focusing on institutional elements, this study argues that press releases form a part of judicial public relations and are used to enhance openness and transparency surrounding specific court… Expand

Tables from this paper

Explaining Media Coverage of Constitutional Court Decisions in Germany: The Role of Case Characteristics
ABSTRACT Research on the media coverage of decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court has revealed that the newsworthiness of a court decision – as determined by specific case characteristics – influencesExpand
Promoted Media Coverage of Court Decisions: Media Gatekeeping of Court Press Releases and the Role of News Values
ABSTRACT The present study focuses on the effect of court press releases on media gatekeeping, a field that has remained largely uninvestigated to date. Using original data on the German FederalExpand
The role of the constitutional complaint in the legislative process: Comparative legal aspect
The article deals with the role of constitutional complaint in the system of quality assurance of the state legislation, for protection of the rights and freedoms. Constitutional complaints, as wellExpand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 47 REFERENCES
The Politics of Judicial Procedures: The Role of Public Oral Hearings in the German Constitutional Court
Modern liberal democracies typically depend on courts with the power of constitutional review to ensure that elected officials do not breach their constitutional obligations. The efficacy of thisExpand
On the Legitimacy of National High Courts
The purpose of this research is to examine theories of diffuse support and institutional legitimacy by testing hypotheses about the interrelationships among the salience of courts, satisfaction withExpand
Media Coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court: How Do Journalists Assess the Importance of Court Decisions?
Agenda-setting theory is central to understanding the connection between media and American government. Indeed, legislative and executive branches of American government are often characterized byExpand
Subsidizing The News?
The relation between organizational press releases and newspaper content has generated considerable attention. Yet longitudinal evidence that can substantiate claims of media’s increased reliance onExpand
Explaining High-Profile Coverage of State Supreme Court Decisions*
In this article, we investigate the decision of media in the U.S. states to give high-profile coverage to state supreme court decisions. While research on the U.S. Supreme Court has forged anExpand
Silence Is no Longer Golden: Media, Public Relations and the Judiciary in Israel
English Abstract: The media policy of judiciaries is inherently fraught with potential conflicts. On the one hand, judiciaries have strong incentives to foster their relations with the media, andExpand
Openness at the Court of Justice of the European Union: Toppling a Taboo
Despite the pervasive rhetoric of transparency characterizing the work of the EU in recent years, the openness of the CJEU vis-a-vis the public appears to have escaped both institutional attentionExpand
The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany
  • D. Kommers
  • Political Science
  • Perspectives on Politics
  • 2006
The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. By Georg Vanberg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. 208p. $70.00. The judicial power to review the constitutionality of laws was a uniqueExpand
THE EFFECTS OF JUDICIAL TRANSPARENCY ON PUBLIC TRUST: EVIDENCE FROM A FIELD EXPERIMENT
Trust in judges is needed for voluntary acceptance of judicial decisions, and judicial transparency is thought to strengthen trust. It exposes the public to symbols that embrace a 'myth of legality'Expand
Three phases of courts’ publicity: reconfiguring Bentham's open justice in the twenty-first century
  • J. Johnston
  • Political Science
  • International Journal of Law in Context
  • 2018
Abstract The paper examines the changing nature of publicity in the courts, tracing three distinct but interconnected phases of publicity using Jeremy Bentham's theory of open justice and publicityExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...