• DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2584488
Corpus ID: 53073309

Judicial Independence and the Rationing of Constitutional Remedies

@article{Huq2015JudicialIA,
  title={Judicial Independence and the Rationing of Constitutional Remedies},
  author={Aziz Huq},
  journal={Duke Law Journal},
  year={2015},
  volume={65},
  pages={1-80}
}

Aziz Huq

Published 2015

Economics

Duke Law Journal

This Article analyzes the doctrinal instruments federal courts use to allocate scarce adjudicative resources over competing demands for constitutional remedies. It advances two claims. The first is that a central, hitherto underappreciated, doctrinal instrument for rationing judicial resources is a demand that most constitutional claimants demonstrate that an official violated an exceptionally clear, unambiguous constitutional rule — that is, not only that the Constitution was violated, but… CONTINUE READING

View PDF

Save to Library

Create Alert

Cite

Launch Research Feed