Judges, Juveniles, and In-Group Bias

  title={Judges, Juveniles, and In-Group Bias},
  author={Briggs Depew and Ozkan Eren and Naci H. Mocan},
  journal={The Journal of Law and Economics},
  pages={209 - 239}
We investigate the existence of in-group bias (preferential treatment of one’s own group) in court decisions. Using the universe of juvenile-court cases in a US state between 1996 and 2012 and exploiting random assignment of juvenile defendants to judges, we find evidence for negative racial in-group bias in judicial decisions. All else being equal, black (white) juveniles who are randomly assigned to black (white) judges are more likely to be placed in custody, as opposed to being placed on… Expand
In-group bias in the Indian judiciary: Evidence from 5.5 million criminal cases
This work exploits quasi-random assignment of judges and changes in judge cohorts to examine whether defendant outcomes are affected by being assigned to a judge with a similar identity, and estimates tight zero effects of in-group bias along gender and religious identity. Expand
Judge Peer Effects in the Courthouse
Although there exists a large literature analyzing whether an individual’s peers have an impact on that individual’s own behavior and subsequent outcomes, there is paucity of research on whetherExpand
Measuring Gender and Religious Bias in the Indian Judiciary
We study judicial in-group bias in Indian criminal courts, collecting data on over 80 million legal case records from 2010–2018. We exploit quasi-random assignment of judges and changes in judgeExpand
Judge Peer E¤ects in the Courthouse
Although there exists a large literature analyzing whether an individual’s peers have an impact on that individual’s own behavior and subsequent outcomes, there is paucity of research on whetherExpand
Emotional Judges and Unlucky Juveniles
Employing the universe of juvenile court decisions in a U.S. state between 1996 and 2012, we analyze the effects of emotional shocks associated with unexpected outcomes of football games played by aExpand
Gender-Based Favoritism Among Criminal Prosecutors
Despite exercising enormous power in criminal cases, the behavior of individual criminal prosecutors is almost completely unstudied by quantitative empirical scholars. Because prosecutors enjoy wideExpand
Gender-based judicial ingroup bias in sex crime sentencing: Evidence from Belgium
Abstract Exploring data on adjudication of sex crimes at a major Belgian court, we study the presence of gender-based judicial ingroup bias in criminal sentencing. Using a difference-in-differenceExpand
The Heavy Costs of High Bail: Evidence from Judge Randomization
In the United States, roughly 450,000 people are detained awaiting trial on any given day, typically because they have not posted bail. Using a large sample of criminal cases in Philadelphia andExpand
Racial Bias and In-Group Bias in Virtual Reality Courtrooms
We filmed videos of criminal trials using three-dimensional virtual reality (VR) technology, prosecuted by actual prosecutors and defended by actual defense attorneys in a real courtroom. This is theExpand
The Effect of Own-Gender Juries on Conviction Rates
This paper examines the extent to which criminal conviction rates are affected by the similarity in gender of the defendant and jury. To identify effects, we exploit random variation in both theExpand


Do Judges Vary in Their Treatment of Race?
Are minorities treated differently by the legal system? Systematic racial differences in case characteristics, many unobservable, make this a difficult question to answer directly. In this paper, weExpand
A Test of Racial Bias in Capital Sentencing
We propose a test of bias based upon patterns of judicial errors. We model the trial court as minimizing a weighted sum of type I and II errors. We define racial bias a situation where the weightExpand
Let My People Go: Ethnic In-Group Bias in Judicial Decisions - Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment
Does ethnic identity affect judicial decisions? We provide new evidence on ethnic biases in judicial behavior by examining the decisions of Arab and Jewish judges in first bail hearings of Arab andExpand
Racial Diversity and Judicial Influence on Appellate Courts
This paper evaluates the substantive consequences of judicial diversity on the U.S. Courts of Appeals. Because of the small percentage of racial minorities on the federal bench, the key question inExpand
Judicial Ingroup Bias in the Shadow of Terrorism
We study ingroup bias--the preferential treatment of members of one's group--in naturally occurring data, where economically significant allocation decisions are made under a strongExpand
A Test of Racial Bias in Capital Sentencing
This paper proposes a test of racial bias in capital sentencing based upon patterns of judicial errors in lower courts. We model the behavior of the trial court as minimizing a weighted sum of theExpand
Do Judges’ Characteristics Matter? Ethnicity, Gender, and Partisanship in Texas State Trial Courts
We explore how government officials’ behavior varies with their ethnicity, gender, and political orientation. Specifically, we analyze criminal sentencing decisions in Texas state district courtsExpand
The Impact of Jury Race in Criminal Trials
This paper examines the impact of jury racial composition on trial outcomes using a unique data set of felony trials in Florida between 2000 and 2010. We utilize a research design that exploitsExpand
Juvenile Incarceration, Human Capital and Future Crime: Evidence from Randomly-Assigned Judges
Over 130,000 juveniles are detained in the US each year with 70,000 in detention on any given day, yet little is known whether such a penalty deters future crime or interrupts social and humanExpand
Women as Policymakers: The Case of Trial Judges
Previous research analyzing differences between men and women political elites has focused primarily on attitudinal differences, recruitment patterns, or background characteristics. In contrast, thisExpand