Judges, Juveniles, and In-Group Bias

@article{Depew2017JudgesJA,
  title={Judges, Juveniles, and In-Group Bias},
  author={Briggs Depew and Ozkan Eren and Naci H. Mocan},
  journal={The Journal of Law and Economics},
  year={2017},
  volume={60},
  pages={209 - 239}
}
We investigate the existence of in-group bias (preferential treatment of one’s own group) in court decisions. Using the universe of juvenile-court cases in a US state between 1996 and 2012 and exploiting random assignment of juvenile defendants to judges, we find evidence for negative racial in-group bias in judicial decisions. All else being equal, black (white) juveniles who are randomly assigned to black (white) judges are more likely to be placed in custody, as opposed to being placed on… 

In-group bias in the Indian judiciary: Evidence from 5.5 million criminal cases

TLDR
This work exploits quasi-random assignment of judges and changes in judge cohorts to examine whether defendant outcomes are affected by being assigned to a judge with a similar identity, and estimates tight zero effects of in-group bias along gender and religious identity.

Judge Peer Effects in the Courthouse

Although there exists a large literature analyzing whether an individual’s peers have an impact on that individual’s own behavior and subsequent outcomes, there is paucity of research on whether

Measuring Gender and Religious Bias in the Indian Judiciary

We study judicial in-group bias in Indian criminal courts, collecting data on over 80 million legal case records from 2010–2018. We exploit quasi-random assignment of judges and changes in judge

Judge Peer E¤ects in the Courthouse

Although there exists a large literature analyzing whether an individual’s peers have an impact on that individual’s own behavior and subsequent outcomes, there is paucity of research on whether

Gender-Based Favoritism Among Criminal Prosecutors

Despite exercising enormous power in criminal cases, the behavior of individual criminal prosecutors is almost completely unstudied by quantitative empirical scholars. Because prosecutors enjoy wide

Gender Favoritism among Criminal Prosecutors

Prosecutors enjoy wide discretion in the decisions they make but are largely unstudied by quantitative empirical scholars. This paper explores gender bias in prosecutorial decision-making. I find

The Effects of Judge Race and Sex on Pretrial Detention Decisions

Abstract The pretrial detention decision has critical implications for a defendant’s employment opportunities, family ties, likelihood of conviction, and length of prison sentence. While prior

The Effect of Own-Gender Jurors on Conviction Rates

Despite concerns about gender bias in general and jurors’ gender in particular, little is known about the effect of jurors’ gender on conviction rates. We identify the effect of own-gender jurors by

The Heavy Costs of High Bail: Evidence from Judge Randomization

In the United States, roughly 450,000 people are detained awaiting trial on any given day, typically because they have not posted bail. Using a large sample of criminal cases in Philadelphia and

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 55 REFERENCES

Do Judges Vary in Their Treatment of Race?

Are minorities treated differently by the legal system? Systematic racial differences in case characteristics, many unobservable, make this a difficult question to answer directly. In this paper, we

Let My People Go: Ethnic In-Group Bias in Judicial Decisions - Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment

Does ethnic identity affect judicial decisions? We provide new evidence on ethnic biases in judicial behavior by examining the decisions of Arab and Jewish judges in first bail hearings of Arab and

Racial Diversity and Judicial Influence on Appellate Courts

This paper evaluates the substantive consequences of judicial diversity on the U.S. Courts of Appeals. Because of the small percentage of racial minorities on the federal bench, the key question in

Do Judges’ Characteristics Matter? Ethnicity, Gender, and Partisanship in Texas State Trial Courts

We explore how government officials’ behavior varies with their ethnicity, gender, and political orientation. Specifically, we analyze criminal sentencing decisions in Texas state district courts

The Impact of Jury Race in Criminal Trials

This paper examines the impact of jury racial composition on trial outcomes using a unique data set of felony trials in Florida between 2000 and 2010. We utilize a research design that exploits

Juvenile Incarceration, Human Capital and Future Crime: Evidence from Randomly-Assigned Judges

Over 130,000 juveniles are detained in the US each year with 70,000 in detention on any given day, yet little is known whether such a penalty deters future crime or interrupts social and human

Women as Policymakers: The Case of Trial Judges

Previous research analyzing differences between men and women political elites has focused primarily on attitudinal differences, recruitment patterns, or background characteristics. In contrast, this

Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging

We enter the debate over the role of sex in judging by addressing the two predominant empirical questions it raises: whether male and female judges decide cases distinctly (individual effects) and

Racial and Sex Disparities in Prison Sentences: The Effect of District‐Level Judicial Demographics

This paper estimates the effect of judicial characteristics (political affiliation, race, and sex) on federal criminal sentencing using variation in judicial characteristics at the district level.

Descriptive Representation and Judicial Outcomes in Multiethnic Societies

The extent to which judicial outcomes depend on judges' identities is a central question in multiethnic societies. Past work on the impact of the racial composition of appellate courts has narrowly
...