Joy and rigor in behavioral science

@article{Collins2021JoyAR,
  title={Joy and rigor in behavioral science},
  author={Hanne K. Collins and Ashley V. Whillans and Leslie K John},
  journal={Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes},
  year={2021},
  volume={164},
  pages={179-191}
}
Abstract In the past decade, behavioral science has seen the introduction of beneficial reforms to reduce false positive results. Serving as the motivational backdrop for the present research, we wondered whether these reforms might have unintended negative consequences for researchers’ behavior and emotional experiences. In an experiment simulating the research process, Study 1 (N = 449 researchers) suggested that engaging in a pre-registration task impeded the discovery of an interesting but… Expand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 79 REFERENCES
Charting the future of social psychology on stormy seas: Winners, losers, and recommendations
Social psychology's current crisis has prompted calls for larger samples and more replications. Building on Sakaluk's (in this issue) distinction between exploration and confirmation, I argue thatExpand
Psychology's Renaissance
TLDR
It is shown that the scientific practices of experimental psychologists have improved dramatically and is argued that meta‐analytical thinking increases the prevalence of false positives. Expand
Exploring Small, Confirming Big: An alternative system to The New Statistics for advancing cumulative and replicable psychological research
Abstract While outlining his vision of The New Statistics, Cumming (2014) proposes that a more rigorous and cumulative psychological science will be built, in part, by having psychologists abandonExpand
On the scientific superiority of conceptual replications for scientific progress
Abstract There is considerable current debate about the need for replication in the science of social psychology. Most of the current discussion and approbation is centered on direct or exactExpand
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
TLDR
A large-scale assessment suggests that experimental reproducibility in psychology leaves a lot to be desired, and correlational tests suggest that replication success was better predicted by the strength of original evidence than by characteristics of the original and replication teams. Expand
An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research
TLDR
This article proposes that researchers preregister their studies and indicate in advance the analyses they intend to conduct, and proposes that only these analyses deserve the label “confirmatory,” and only for these analyses are the common statistical tests valid. Expand
False-Positive Psychology
TLDR
It is shown that despite empirical psychologists’ nominal endorsement of a low rate of false-positive findings, flexibility in data collection, analysis, and reporting dramatically increases actual false- positive rates, and a simple, low-cost, and straightforwardly effective disclosure-based solution is suggested. Expand
Emodiversity and the emotional ecosystem.
TLDR
Two cross-sectional studies across more than 37,000 respondents demonstrate that emodiversity is an independent predictor of mental and physical health--such as decreased depression and doctor's visits--over and above mean levels of positive and negative emotion. Expand
Some Good NewS About RumiNAtioN: tASk-FocuSed thiNkiNG AFteR FAiluRe FAcilitAteS PeRFoRmANce imPRovemeNt
Is there an adaptive side to rumination? We tested whether rumination that is focused on correcting past mistakes and active goal achievement could produce positive outcomes; this is in contrast toExpand
Registered reports: an early example and analysis
TLDR
A retrospective and observational comparison of Registered and non-Registered Reports published in the EJP during a seventeen-year period provides circumstantial evidence to suggest that the approach helped to reduce questionable research practices. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...