Journal status

@article{Bollen2006JournalS,
  title={Journal status},
  author={Johan Bollen and Michael A. Rodriguez and Herbert Van de Sompel},
  journal={Scientometrics},
  year={2006},
  volume={69},
  pages={669-687}
}
SummaryThe status of an actor in a social context is commonly defined in terms of two factors: the total number of endorsements the actor receives from other actors and the prestige of the endorsing actors. These two factors indicate the distinction between popularity and expert appreciation of the actor, respectively. We refer to the former as popularity and to the latter as prestige. These notions of popularity and prestige also apply to the domain of scholarly assessment. The ISI Impact… 

Generalized h-index for Disclosing Latent Facts in Citation Networks

Several inefficiencies of the h-index are demonstrated and a pair of generalizations and effective variants of it are developed to deal with scientist ranking and with publication forum ranking.

Quantifying the influence of scientists and their publications: distinguishing between prestige and popularity

This paper argues that by whom the paper is being cited is of greater significance than merely the number of citations, and proposes an interactive model of author–paper bipartite networks as well as an iterative algorithm to obtain better rankings for scientists and their publications.

Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks

The effectiveness and the benefits of the new indices are exhibited to unfold the full potential of the h-index, with extensive experimental results obtained from the DBLP, a widely known on-line digital library.

Journal influence factors

Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor

The audience factor is a variant of a fractional citation-counting scheme, but computed on the citing journal rather than the citing article or disciplinary level, and, in contrast to other cited-side normalization strategies, is focused on the behavior of the citing entities.

P-score: a reputation bibliographic index that complements citation counts

This paper studies the correlation between P-score, a publication record index and H-index, a very popular citation-based index, in the setting of conference ranking, and identifies publication venues with high H-indices and low P-scores.

PageRank, HITS and Impact Factor for Journal Ranking

It is demonstrated how popular webpage algorithm PageRank and HITS can be used ranking journal, and the merit and shortcomings and the scope of application that the various algorithms are used to rank journal are discussed.

P-Rank: An indicator measuring prestige in heterogeneous scholarly networks

This work proposes a new informetric indicator, P-Rank, for measuring prestige in heterogeneous scholarly networks containing articles, authors, and journals and provides a new approach to examining prestige in scholarly communication networks in a more comprehensive and nuanced way.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 45 REFERENCES

Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences?

The core of the problem lies not necessarily at the side of the data producer, but part of the broader problem of the application of insufficiently developed bibliometric indicators used by persons who do not have clear competence and experience in the field of quantitative studies of science.

[The journal impact factor as a parameter for the evaluation of researchers and research].

The present article calls for research evaluation in accordance with the recommendations of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and of the ArbeitsgemeINSchaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften and more intensive occupation with and organization of medical knowledge processes.

Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community

Assessing the quality of scholarly journals in Linguistics:An alternative to citation-based journal impact factors

Methods were developed to allow quality assessment of academic research in linguistics in all sub-disciplines and the potentials for application of bibliometric methods in output assessments are discussed.

Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research

Alternative methods for evaluating research are being sought, such as citation rates and journal impact factors, which seem to be quantitative and objective indicators directly related to published science.

Can scientific journals be classified in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations using the Journal Citation Reports?

The factor-analytic solutions allow us to test classifications against the structures contained in the database; in this article the process will be demonstrated for the delineation of a set of biochemistry journals.

Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance

The usefulness of the impact factor measures in macro, meso and micro analyses is displayed and the main advantages, such as the great accessibility of impact factor and its ready-to-use nature are pointed out.

ISI's Impact Factor as Misnomer: A Proposed New Measure to Assess Journal Impact

The purpose of this communication is to discuss a widely used measure of journal impact that is defined by the Institute of Scientific Information (ISI) and available for thousands of journals in the

Results from a web impact factor crawler

The principal findings were that with certain restrictions, WIFs can be calculated reliably, but do not correlate with accepted research rankings owing to the variety of material hosted on university servers.