John Stuart Mill and Experiments in Living

  title={John Stuart Mill and Experiments in Living},
  author={Elizabeth S. Anderson},
  pages={4 - 26}
John Stuart Mill thought that we learn about the good through "experiments in living."' As an empiricist, he rejected the traditional view that we know about the good through a priori intuitions. Conceptions of the good must be tested by the experiences we have in living them out, not merely by comparing them with ethical intuitions. This article offers a reconstruction of Mill's theory of experiments in living. I argue that Mill regarded his own early life as an experiment in living which… 

Two Pessimisms in Mill

  • J. Fox
  • Art, Philosophy
  • 2021
Abstract Mill defines utilitarianism as the combination of a “theory of life” and a moral claim: only pleasure and freedom from pain are desirable as ends, and the promotion of happiness is the sole

Expanding the Justificatory Framework of Mill's Experiments in Living

In On Liberty, Mill introduced the concept of ‘experiments in living’. I will provide an account of what Mill saw to be the basic problem he was addressing – the extensive pressure to fit in with the

Troubling appropriations: JS Mill, liberalism, and the virtues of uncertainty

Described as the ‘exemplary liberal’, John Stuart Mill is employed to support a dizzying array of different, even competing visions of liberalism. That he has been so widely appropriated is certainly

The good, the right & the exigencies of life: John Dewey & the value of moral disagreement

ion in empirical standards, such as their utility and satisfactoriness. This is a regulatory notion of truth. Experience corrects our beliefs and formulas by triggering the process of thinking. “‘The

The Blackwell guide to Mill's utilitarianism

Notes on Contributors. Introduction. Part I: The Background of Mill's Utilitarianism. 1. Mill's Life: Susan Leigh Anderson (University of Connecticut). 2. Bentham's Utilitarianism: Gerald J. Postema

Recent Critics of Mill's Qualitative Hedonism

Abstract Two recent critics of Mill's qualitative hedonism, Michael Hauskeller and Kristin Schaupp, argue that Mill's distinction between higher and lower pleasures was largely unsuccessful. They

Mill’s Moral Philosophy

This chapter will examine Mill’s revisionist utilitarianism. I want to show that ideas such as self-cultivation and social improvement lie at the heart of Mill’s moral theory. In order to understand

The Worm at the Root of the Passions: Poetry and Sympathy in Mill's Utilitarianism

I claim that Mill has a theory of poetry which he uses to reconcile nineteenth century associationist psychology, the tendency of the intellect to dissolve associations, and the need for educated

The rationality of political experimentation

Theorists from John Stuart Mill to Robert Nozick have argued that citizens can gain insight into the demands of justice by experimenting with diverse forms of political life. I consider the

Books before Chocolate? The Insufficiency of Mill's Evidence for Higher Pleasures

Recent attempts to defend Mill's account of higher and lower pleasures have overlooked a critical flaw in Mill's argument. Mill considers the question of pleasure and preference as an empirical one,