John Keegan and the Grand Tradition of Trashing Clausewitz: a Polemic

  title={John Keegan and the Grand Tradition of Trashing Clausewitz: a Polemic},
  author={Christopher Bassford},
  journal={War in History},
  pages={319 - 336}
Rather like Cato the Elder, ending every speech with his famous ‘d lenda est Carthago’, the British historian-cum-journalist Basil Liddell Hart (1895-1970) routinely included in his many publications a ringing denunciation of the Prussian military philosopher, Carl von Clausewitz. He occasionally deviated from this practice, e.g., after some authoritative figure like Spenser Wilkinson had publicly pointed out the many errors, inconsistencies and blatant contradictions which Liddell Hart’s… Expand
Clausewitz, Keegan, and the Big History of Warfare
As a social phenomenon, is war subordinate to politics, as Carl von Clausewitz argued in the early nineteenth century, or, instead, is it the product of an instinctive ‘warrior culture’, common toExpand
Resurrecting the "Icon" The Enduring Relevance of Clausewitz's On War
Abstract : For students of strategy, Carl von Clausewitz has long been a polarizing figure. Notwithstanding their rather different interpretations of "On War," soldiers, statesmen, and scholars suchExpand
War without End(s): The End of Clausewitz?
This article argues that both anti- and pro-Clausewitzians have tended to base their views on an incomplete understanding of Clausewitz. We claim that the so-called ‘new wars’ do not require a newExpand
Clausewitz: War, Peace and Politics
According to Albert Einstein, “You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war.” (Think/Exist 2009) In a constant state of preparation for war, Carl von Clausewitz penned Vom Kriege. HeavilyExpand
Sandcastle of Theory
Amitai Etzioni’s communitarianism offers an attractive but impractical vision. The global threats that he cites as engines for a communitarian future are not convincing as the triggers for epochalExpand
Clausewitz first, and last, and always: war, strategy and intelligence in the twenty-first century
[I]n war more than any other subject we must begin by looking at the nature of the whole; for here more than elsewhere the part and the whole must always be thought of together. . .I shall not beginExpand
Guerrillas in the mist: reassessing strategy and low intensity warfare
The argument advanced here seeks to demonstrate that terms like ‘guerrilla warfare’ and ‘low intensity conflict’ are fundamentally flawed. They do not exist as proper categories of war. Often theyExpand
Busting the Icon. Restoring Balance to the Influence of Clausewitz
Abstract : Many US military thinkers and practitioners have embraced a view of war that is out of touch with current circumstances--and, consequently, dangerous. This has a direct effect on theExpand
Beyond Vom Kriege: The Character and Conduct of Modern War
This article was first published in the Summer 2005 issue of Parameters. "You may not be interested in war.., but war is interested in you." --Leon Trotsky It is the tragedy of history that manExpand
New War, Good War and the War on Terror: Explaining, Excusing and Creating Western Neo‐interventionism
This contribution is concerned with the manner in which current dominant security narratives intersect with discourses of imperialism and post-imperialism with regard to the post-Cold War dominanceExpand


Fuller to Sloane, undated but in reply to letter, Sloane to Fuller
    IV/6/6a, Liddell Hart Centre for Military Archives