It may be harder than we thought, but political diversity will (still) improve social psychological science.

  title={It may be harder than we thought, but political diversity will (still) improve social psychological science.},
  author={Jarret T. Crawford and Jose L. Duarte and Jonathan Haidt and Lee Jussim and Charlotta Stern and Philip E. Tetlock},
  journal={The Behavioral and brain sciences},
In our target article, we made four claims: (1) Social psychology is now politically homogeneous; (2) this homogeneity sometimes harms the science; (3) increasing political diversity would reduce this damage; and (4) some portion of the homogeneity is due to a hostile climate and outright discrimination against non-liberals. In this response, we review these claims in light of the arguments made by a diverse group of commentators. We were surprised to find near-universal agreement with our… 
A Conservative’s View from the Academic Trenches: Reply to Duarte, Crawford, Stern, Haidt, Jussim, and Tetlock (2015)
Although conservative scholars may face a variety of forms of discrimination in academia and other challenges, as elaborated in the first part of this comment, they may also have a set of unique
Population, Reproductive, and Sexual Health: Data Are Essential Where Disciplines Meet and Ideologies Conflict
The new Section on Population, Reproductive and Sexual Health, Frontiers in Public Health will contribute constructively to critical needs of human population, sexuality, and reproduction.
Publication bias and stereotype threat research: A reply to Zigerell.
It is demonstrated that 4 methods of examining publication bias applied to the meta-analysis presented by Nguyen and Ryan (2008) on stereotype threat effects yield highly divergent conclusions, and commentary is provided on the state of this research focus.
Navigating Treacherous Waters—One Researcher's 40 Years of Experience with Controversial Scientific Research1,2:
Science often must deal with issues that are politically controversial. However, there are dangers in dealing with controversial research and serious risks to the process of doing science and to th...


Understanding the Determinants of Political Ideology: Implications of Structural Complexity
There has been a substantial increase in research on the determinants and consequences of political ideology among political scientists and social psychologists. In psychology, researchers have
Political psychology or politicized psychology: Is the road to scientific hell paved with good moral intentions?
This article proceeds from the premise that a completely value-neutral political psychology is impossible. Testing hypotheses about the efficacy of deterrence or the pervasiveness of racism or the
Political Diversity in Social and Personality Psychology
  • Y. Inbar, J. Lammers
  • Psychology
    Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science
  • 2012
Surprisingly, although only 6% described themselves as conservative “overall,” there was more diversity of political opinion on economic issues and foreign policy and the more liberal respondents were, the more they said they would discriminate against openly conservative colleagues.
“Not for All the Tea in China!” Political Ideology and the Avoidance of Dissonance-Arousing Situations
The results of these experiments provide initial evidence of ideological differences in dissonance avoidance, and future work would do well to determine whether such differences are specific to political issues or topics that are personally important.
The Ideological-Conflict Hypothesis
Decades of research in social and political psychology have demonstrated that political conservatives appear more intolerant toward a variety of groups than do political liberals. Recent work from
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
Across 4 studies using multiple methods, liberals consistently showed greater endorsement and use of the Harm/care and Fairness/reciprocity foundations compared to the other 3 foundations, whereas conservatives endorsed and used the 5 foundations more equally.
Liberal Privilege in Academic Psychology and the Social Sciences
  • L. Jussim
  • Education
    Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science
  • 2012
This comment refutes (or, at least, vigorously contests) some of the most common arguments that have attempted to defend social psychology from charges of unscientific and distorting liberal biases.
Thinking, Fast and Slow
Daniel Kahneman, recipient of the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences for his seminal work in psychology challenging the rational model of judgment and decision making, is one of the world's most