It Takes Two: An Explanation of the Democratic Peace

@article{Levy2003ItTT,
  title={It Takes Two: An Explanation of the Democratic Peace},
  author={Gilat Levy and Ronny Razin},
  journal={CEPR Discussion Paper Series},
  year={2003}
}
In this paper, we provide an explanation of the democratic peace hypothesis, i.e., the observation that democracies rarely fight one another. We show that in the presence of information asymmetries and strategic complements, the strategic interaction between two democracies differs from any other dyad. In our model, two democracies induce the highest probability of peaceful resolution of conflicts. But it takes two for peace; one democracy involved in a conflict does not necessarily increases… Expand
The Democratic Peace: An Experimental Test of a Causal Relation and of Underlying Mechanisms
Democracies go to war with each other less frequently than dictatorships do with each other. This is an established empirical regularity. However, it is not clear whether there is a causal linkExpand
A small victorious war: political institutions and international conflict
The paper provides an extremly simple model of the interaction of international and internal conflicts. However, unlike the dominant approach in the literature, which looks at these two types ofExpand
Democracy, autocracy and the likelihood of international conflict
This is a game-theoretic analysis of the link between regime type and international conflict. Democratic leaders can credibly be punished for bad conflict outcomes, whereas autocratic leaders cannot.Expand
Democracy and Interstate War
The study of democracy and interstate war is a flourishing theme in political science, particularly since the 1970s. However, there are four reasons why democracy does not cause peace, and why theExpand
Democracy, Autocracy and the Likelihood of International Conflict
This is a game-theoretic analysis of the link between regime type and international conflict. The democratic electorate can credibly punish the leader for bad conflict outcomes, whereas theExpand
Political Institutions and War Initiation: The Democratic Peace Hypothesis Revisited
This chapter analyzes the influence of democratic institutions---specifically, the effects of (i) electoral uncertainty when individuals within a nation have different preferences over publicExpand
Regime Type, the Fate of Leaders, and War
We propose and test a formal model of war and domestic politics, building on recent evidence on the relationship between regime type, the effect of war on the probability of losing office, and theExpand
Domestic Political Survival and International Conflict: Is Democracy Good for Peace?
We build a game-theoretic model where aggression can be triggered by domestic political concerns as well as the fear of being attacked. In the model, leaders of full and limited democracies riskExpand
Electoral Incentives, Term Limits and the Sustainability of Peace
One of the few stylized facts in international relations is that democracies, unlike autocracies, almost never fight each other. We develop a theoretical model to examine the sustainability ofExpand
Democratic Peace and Electoral Accountability¤
One of the few stylized facts in international relations is that democracies, unlike autoc- racies, very rarely fight each other. We examine the sustainability of international peace betweenExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 31 REFERENCES
An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace
We examine formally the link between domestic political institutions and policy choices in the context of eight empirical regularities that constitute the democratic peace. We demonstrate thatExpand
Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World
By illuminating the conflict-resolving mechanisms inherent in the relationships between democracies, Bruce Russett explains one of the most promising developments of the modern international system:Expand
Polities and Peace
In this paper, we review the central claim of a growing literature: that is, that democratic states rarely, if ever, wage war against and are very unlikely to engage in militarized disputes withExpand
Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946-1986
Democratic states are in general about as conflict- and war-prone as nondemocracies, but democracies have rarely clashed with one another in violent conflict. We first show that democracy, as well asExpand
Debating the Democratic Peace
Are democracies less likely to go to war than other kinds of states? This question is of tremendous importance in both academic and policy-making circles and one that has been debated by politicalExpand
Domestic Opposition and Signaling in International Crises
This article explores the effect of domestic political competition on the escalation of international crises. It combines an incomplete information model of crisis bargaining with a simple model ofExpand
Democracy and the Management of International Conflict
The research reported here extends investigation of the democracy-war hypothesis by focusing on the norms of dispute resolution integral to the democratic process. If we extend these norms to theExpand
Domestic Political Institutions, Credible Commitments, and International Cooperation
I consider the influence of domestic political institutions on the ability of leaders to establish bilateral cooperation in the international system. Leaders operating in different domesticExpand
The Politics of 1992: Fiscal Policy and European Integration
The internal market in Europe will greatly increase the international mobility of resources. How will this affect fiscal policy in different countries? The first part of the paper considers taxationExpand
War and reason : domestic and international imperatives
In this work two theorists of international relations analyze the strategies designed to avoid international conflict. Using a combination of game theory, statistical analysis and case histories, theExpand
...
1
2
3
4
...