It’s no accident: Our bias for intentional explanations
@article{Rosset2008ItsNA,
title={It’s no accident: Our bias for intentional explanations},
author={E. Rosset},
journal={Cognition},
year={2008},
volume={108},
pages={771-780}
}Three studies tested the idea that our analyses of human behavior are guided by an "intentionality bias," an implicit bias where all actions are judged to be intentional by default. In Study 1 participants read a series of sentences describing actions that can be done either on purpose or by accident (e.g., "He set the house on fire") and had to decide which interpretation best characterized the action. To tap people's initial interpretation, half the participants made their judgments under… CONTINUE READING
Paper Mentions
NEWS ARTICLE
NEWS ARTICLE
NEWS ARTICLE
143 Citations
Syntax and intentionality: An automatic link between language and theory-of-mind
- Medicine, Psychology
- 2014
7
Control blindness: Why people can make incorrect inferences about the intentions of others
- Medicine, Psychology
- 2017
5
Does intentionality decision-making depend on who you are? The role of individual differences.
- Psychology
- 2018
The intentional mind and the hot hand: Perceiving intentions makes streaks seem likely to continue
- Medicine, Psychology
- 2010
46
Individual differences in the intentionality bias and its association with cognitive empathy
- Psychology
- 2018
5
Understanding intentional actions from observers’ viewpoints: A social neuroscience perspective
- Psychology, Medicine
- 2016
11
Predicting premeditation: future behavior is seen as more intentional than past behavior.
- Medicine, Psychology
- 2012
26
References
Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 31 REFERENCES



