It’s no accident: Our bias for intentional explanations

@article{Rosset2008ItsNA,
  title={It’s no accident: Our bias for intentional explanations},
  author={E. Rosset},
  journal={Cognition},
  year={2008},
  volume={108},
  pages={771-780}
}
  • E. Rosset
  • Published 2008
  • Medicine, Psychology
  • Cognition
  • Three studies tested the idea that our analyses of human behavior are guided by an "intentionality bias," an implicit bias where all actions are judged to be intentional by default. In Study 1 participants read a series of sentences describing actions that can be done either on purpose or by accident (e.g., "He set the house on fire") and had to decide which interpretation best characterized the action. To tap people's initial interpretation, half the participants made their judgments under… CONTINUE READING

    Tables and Topics from this paper.

    “There Is No Such Thing as an Accident,” Especially When People Are Drunk
    20
    Syntax and intentionality: An automatic link between language and theory-of-mind
    7
    Motive-matching: Perceptions of intentionality for coerced action
    12
    Information-Acquisition Processes in Moral Judgments of Blame
    6
    Individual differences in the intentionality bias and its association with cognitive empathy
    5

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 31 REFERENCES
    Intention and the omission bias: Omissions perceived as nondecisions
    47
    Intentional action in folk psychology: An experimental investigation
    304
    The Folk Concept of Intentionality
    526
    The illusion of conscious will
    1060
    Outcome bias in decision evaluation.
    507
    Discerning intentions in dynamic human action
    317
    The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion
    2113
    The infant's theory of self-propelled objects
    480