It’s Splitsville: Why Animal Ethics and Environmental Ethics Are Incompatible

@article{Faria2019ItsSW,
  title={It’s Splitsville: Why Animal Ethics and Environmental Ethics Are Incompatible},
  author={C{\'a}tia Faria and Eze Paez},
  journal={American Behavioral Scientist},
  year={2019},
  volume={63},
  pages={1047 - 1060}
}
In this article, we claim that animal ethics and environmental ethics are incompatible ethical positions. This is because they have incompatible criteria of moral considerability and they have, at least in some cases, incompatible normative implications regarding the interests of sentient individuals. Moreover, we claim that environmentalist views lead to an insurmountable dilemma between inconsistency and implausibility and fail to properly account for the importance of wild animal suffering… Expand
Climate Change Impacts on Free-Living Nonhuman Animals. Challenges for Media and Communication Ethics
The mainstream discussion regarding climate change in politics, public opinion and the media has focused almost exclusively on preventing the harms humans suffer due to global warming. Yet climateExpand
Preventing Zoonotic Emerging Disease Outbreaks: The Need to Complement One Health with Ethical Considerations
Human encroachment on the habitats of wild animals and the dense living conditions of farmed animals increase spill-over risk of emerging infectious diseases from animals to humans (such asExpand
Political Generations and the Italian Environmental Movement(s): Innovative Youth Activism and the Permanence of Collective Actors
During recent years, Italian social movements have experienced a period of crisis, in part due to diffuse antipolitical feelings and latent social conflict. However, environmental issues andExpand
Take politics off the table: A study of Italian youth’s self-managed dairy restriction and healthy consumerism
The last 20 years have been characterized by very different dynamics: massive reduction of milk and, to a lesser extent, dairy consumption; fewer positive attitudes towards milk; no reclaims forExpand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 70 REFERENCES
Animal Liberation and Environmental Ethics: Bad Marriage, Quick Divorce
form of life for itself. We have reached something for which we need a third term: systemic value. Du­ ties arise in encounters with the system that projects and protects these member components inExpand
The Ethics of the Ecology of Fear against the Nonspeciesist Paradigm: A Shift in the Aims of Intervention in Nature
Humans often intervene in the wild for anthropocentric or environmental reasons. An example of such interventions is the reintroduction of wolves in places where they no longer live in order toExpand
Animal ethics goes wild: the problem of wild animal suffering and intervention in nature
In this thesis I claim that, on the assumption that we have reasons to assist other individuals in need, there are decisive reasons to intervene in nature to prevent or reduce the harms wild animalsExpand
Morals, Reason and Animals
TLDR
Anyone with an interest in ethical decision-making would find great value in this book, and Gert has dealt with complex issues in a manner which is likely to appeal to the intelligent lay reader. Expand
The scope of the argument from species overlap
The argument from species overlap has been widely used in the literature on animal ethics and speciesism. However, there has been much confusion regarding what the argument proves and what it doesExpand
Animal Liberation: A Triangular Affair
The ethical foundations of the "animal liberation" movement are compared with those of Aldo Leopold's "land ethic," which is taken as the paradigm for environmental ethics in general. NotwithstandingExpand
Animal liberation is an environmental ethic
I begin by briefly tracing the history of the split between environmental ethics and animal liberation, go on to sketch a theory of value that I think is implicit in animal liberation, and explainExpand
What is Speciesism?
In spite of the considerable literature nowadays existing on the issue of the moral exclusion of nonhuman animals, there is still work to be done concerning the characterization of the conceptualExpand
Anthropocentrism and Its Discontents: The Moral Status of Animals in the History of Western Philosophy
"Anthropocentrism and Its Discontents" is the first-ever comprehensive examination of views of animals in the history of Western philosophy, from Homeric Greece to the twentieth century. In recentExpand
Babies and Beasts: THE ARGUMENT FROM MARGINAL CASES
Both its defenders and detractors have described the argument from marginal cases as the most important to date in defense of animal rights. Hotly debated among philosophers for some twenty years,Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...