Issues in performing a network meta-analysis.


The example of the analysis of a collection of trials in diabetes consisting of a sparsely connected network of 10 treatments is used to make some points about approaches to analysis. In particular various graphical and tabular presentations, both of the network and of the results are provided and the connection to the literature of incomplete blocks is made. It is clear from this example that is inappropriate to treat the main effect of trial as random and the implications of this for analysis are discussed. It is also argued that the generalisation from a classic random-effect meta-analysis to one applied to a network usually involves strong assumptions about the variance components involved. Despite this, it is concluded that such an analysis can be a useful way of exploring a set of trials.

DOI: 10.1177/0962280211432220
Citations per Year

Citation Velocity: 11

Averaging 11 citations per year over the last 3 years.

Learn more about how we calculate this metric in our FAQ.

Cite this paper

@article{Senn2013IssuesIP, title={Issues in performing a network meta-analysis.}, author={Stephen Senn and François Gavini and David Magrez and Andr{\'e} Scheen}, journal={Statistical methods in medical research}, year={2013}, volume={22 2}, pages={169-89} }