Corpus ID: 27567869

Is the Year of First Publication a Good Proxy of Scholars' Academic Age?

@inproceedings{Costas2015IsTY,
  title={Is the Year of First Publication a Good Proxy of Scholars' Academic Age?},
  author={Rodrigo Costas and Tina Nane and Vincent Larivi{\`e}re},
  booktitle={ISSI},
  year={2015}
}
Individual scholars are the central unit of the research system and are increasingly the focus of bibliometric studies. An important aspect in the study of individual scholars is their academic age, which allows for the comparison of scholars that have been academically active in a similar period of time. Based on a sample of Quebec researchers for whom their year of birth, PhD year as well as the year of their first publication are known, we study the relationships among these ages with the… Expand
Domestic researchers with longer careers generate higher average citation impact but it does not increase over time
TLDR
Assessment of career citation impact changes 2001–2016 for domestic researchers from the 12 nations with most Scopus documents shows that long-term domestic researchers do not tend to improve their citation impact over time but tend to achieve their average citation impact by their first or second Scopus journal article. Expand
Author response for "Domestic researchers with longer careers generate higher average citation impact but it does not increase over time"
Information about the relative strengths of scholars is needed for the efficient running of knowledge systems. Because academic research requires many skills, more experienced researchers mightExpand
Understanding success through the diversity of collaborators and the milestone of career
TLDR
The results show that collaborating with authoritative authors plays an important role prior to a researcher's PhD graduation, but working with non‐authoritative authors carries more weight after PhD graduation. Expand
How does research productivity relate to gender? Analyzing gender differences for multiple publication dimensions
TLDR
It is found that women do research and write manuscripts, but may have different publication patterns: instead of submitting to competitive journals, they may be satisfied with less-prestigious book chapters, which may be disadvantageous for women. Expand
Tracing scientific mobility of Early Career Researchers in Spain and The Netherlands through their publications
TLDR
More sophisticated bibliometric analyses and comparisons with different 'generations' of researchers, possibly combined with qualitative investigation, will be required to better understand the role and function of national institutional context in both research mobility and research careers. Expand
Scholars on Twitter: who and how many are they?
TLDR
By combining bibliometric data from Web of Science and Twitter users identified by this http URL, this paper has obtained the largest set of individual scholars matched with Twitter users made so far, and finds a strong presence of researchers from the Social Sciences and the Humanities. Expand
Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production
TLDR
It is shown that scientific work is more highly divided in medical disciplines than in mathematics, physics, and disciplines of the social sciences, and that, with the exception of medicine, the writing of the paper is the task most often associated with authorship. Expand
Large-scale identification and characterization of scholars on Twitter
TLDR
A new method for identifying scholars who have a Twitter account from bibliometric data from Web of Science (WoS) and Twitter data from Altmetric.com is presented, which reliably identifies matches between Twitter accounts and scholarly authors. Expand
Towards a global scientific brain: Indicators of researcher mobility using co-affiliation data
TLDR
The potential use of bibliometric data for mapping and applying network analysis to mobility flows is analyzed and three different levels of aggregation are shown: at the country level, at the city level and at the institutional level. Expand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 24 REFERENCES
The Effects of Aging on Researchers' Publication and Citation Patterns
TLDR
Drawing on a sizeable sample of 6,388 university professors in Quebec who have published at least one paper between 2000 and 2007, the results identify two turning points in the professors' careers, showing clearly that productivity and impact are not a simple and declining function of age and that they must take into account the collaborative aspects of scientific research. Expand
Analysis of bibliometric indicators for individual scholars in a large data set
TLDR
This work analyzes the scientific profile of more than 30,000 researchers, and finds that the h-index of a scientist is strongly correlated with the number of citations that she/he has received so that theNumber of citations can be effectively be used as a proxy of theh-index. Expand
Do age and professional rank influence the order of authorship in scientific publications? Some evidence from a micro-level perspective
TLDR
There is a strong trend for signatures of younger researchers and those in the lower professional ranks to appear in the first position, while more veteran or highly-ranked ones, who tend to play supervisory functions in research, are proportionally more likely to sign in the last position. Expand
Productivity, impact and publication habits by gender in the area of Materials Science
TLDR
A different life-cycle of productivity is found for men and woman and the most important inter-gender differences in productivity occur at the ages of 40-59. Expand
A bibliometric approach to tracking international scientific migration
TLDR
It is concluded that the bibliometric approach is promising provided that its outcomes are interpreted with care, based on insight into the limits and potentialities of the approach, and combined with complementary data, obtained, for instance, from researchers’ Curricula Vitae o, survey or questionnaire- based data. Expand
Long-term variations in the aging of scientific literature: From exponential growth to steady-state science (1900-2004)
TLDR
The major finding of this article is that contrary to a widely held belief, the age of cited material has risen continuously since the mid1960s, and it is suggested that this phenomenon is a direct response to the steady-state dynamics of modern science that followed its exponential growth. Expand
The skewness of scientific productivity
TLDR
The parallelism of the results for the population as a whole and for the subset of successful authors, when productivity is measured as mean citation per article per person, reveals the fractal nature of the skewness of scientific productivity in this case. Expand
International temporary mobility of researchers: a cross-discipline study
TLDR
The extent to which information obtained from researchers’ electronic curriculum vitae (CV) may be used to study temporary geographical mobility is explored, exploiting a new type of data set—a comprehensive database of electronic CVs— developing a broad set of cross-discipline mobility indicators to assess the dimensions and characteristics of international research visits among a population of over 10,000 researchers. Expand
Age and research productivity of academic scientists
Age-publishing profiles are estimated for four fields of science using data from the 1977 Survey of Doctorate Recipients. The five measures of publishing activity used allow for analysis of theExpand
At what age do biomedical scientists do their best work?
TLDR
High‐quality scientific productivity in the biomedical fields as a function of investigator's age plots an inverted U‐shaped curve, in which significant decreases take place from around 40 yr of age and beyond. Expand
...
1
2
3
...