Is the State a Corporation? *

@article{Runciman2000IsTS,
  title={Is the State a Corporation? *},
  author={David Runciman},
  journal={Government and Opposition},
  year={2000},
  volume={35},
  pages={90 - 104}
}
  • D. Runciman
  • Published 1 January 2000
  • History
  • Government and Opposition
THE PURPOSE OF THIS ARTICLE IS TO ESTABLISH THE RELEVANCE OF the question that forms its title for contemporary political theory. It is not an obvious question, both because it is not obvious what the answer is, but also because it is not obvious what it means in contemporary terms. In order to establish its significance, it is necessary first of all to establish what the question does mean, and what the term ‘corporation’ means within it. It is, ultimately, a philosophical question, and the… 

Moral Responsibility and the Problem of Representing the State

There are two points in particular that I wish to make in this chapter. First, if states as they exist in the modern world are to be identified with moral agents,1 this only makes sense in the terms

Politics of the Corporation

The corporate form and its capacity for agency is recognized in political theory, but not adequately understood. As a result, important shifts in the relative position of the state and the corporate

Political Representation: Hobbes's theory of representation: anti-democratic or proto-democratic?

Hobbes, representation, and democracy Thomas Hobbes occupies a deeply ambivalent position in the history of modern conceptions of political representation. On the one hand, he is often credited as

The Political Philosophy of Needs: The formation and interpretation of needs

In the previous chapter I developed an understanding of needs based on need forms and categories of human needs that identified the historical, normative, instrumental and thus political nature of

Is the U.S. Government a Corporation? The Corporate Origins of Modern Constitutionalism

The U.S. Constitution is best understood not as a “social contract,” but as a popularly issued corporate charter. The earliest American colonies were literal corporations of the Crown and, like all

Sharing the costs of political injustices

It is commonly thought that when democratic states act wrongly, they should bear the costs of the harm they cause. However, since states are collective agents, their financial burdens pass on to

Leviathan on trial: should states be held criminally responsible?

Abstract Many political theorists, philosophers, and International Relations scholars argue that states are ‘corporate moral agents’, which can be held responsible in many of the same ways as

The Political Philosophy of Needs

Preface Introduction 1. Liberalism's rights-preferences couple 2. Beyond the rights-preferences couple 3. The form and outline of the argument Part I. The Nature of Needs: 4. Need categories 5. Vital

Index to Volume 35

A Community of Law? ‘European’ Law and Judicial Politics: The Court of Justice and Beyond. By DANIEL WINCOTT. No. 1, pp. 3–26 A House for the Future: Debating Second Chamber Reform in the United

The two faces of personhood: Hobbes, corporate agency and the personality of the state:

This research was funded by a Doctoral Fellowship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; a Rothermere Fellowship from the Rothermere Foundation; and a J.W. Pickersgill

References

SHOWING 1-5 OF 5 REFERENCES

The Retreat of the state

Adopting new and much more comprehensive concepts of both power and politics, The Retreat of the State develops a theoretical framework to show who really governs the world economy. It goes on to

Pluralism and the personality of the state

Preface Part I. The Personality of Associations: 1. Introduction 2. Hobbes and the person of the commonwealth 3. Gierke and the Genossenschaft 4. Trusts and sovereigns Part II. Political Pluralism:

On Human Conduct.

On the theoretical understanding of human conduct On the civil condition On the character of a modern European state

Political theories of the middle age

This is a translation of Gierke's "Die publicistischen Lehren des Mittelalters", first published in 1881, which was a section of Volume 3 of his "Das deutsche Genossenschaftsrecht". The text includes