Is the Reality Criterion Analytic?

@article{Glick2019IsTR,
  title={Is the Reality Criterion Analytic?},
  author={David Glick and Florian J. Boge},
  journal={Erkenntnis},
  year={2019}
}
Tim Maudlin has claimed that EPR's Reality Criterion is analytically true. We argue that it is not. Moreover, one may be a subjectivist about quantum probabilities without giving up on objective physical reality. Thus, would-be detractors must reject QBism and other epistemic approaches to quantum theory on other grounds. 
2 Citations
On the meaning of EPR’s Reality Criterion
This essay has two main claims about EPR’s Reality Criterion. First, we claim that the application of the Reality Criterion makes an essential difference between the EPR argument and Einstein’s later
No-go theorems: What are they good for?

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 27 REFERENCES
Quantum Theory and the Limits of Objectivity
  • R. Healey
  • Philosophy
    Foundations of Physics
  • 2018
Three recent arguments seek to show that the universal applicability of unitary quantum theory is inconsistent with the assumption that a well-conducted measurement always has a definite physical
Comment on ‘What Bell did’
According to Maudlin, Bell showed that it is the World which is non-lcoal, and not just some particular theories of it. I argue that this conclusion is arrived at by taking for granted all
Quantum Bayesianism: A study
The Reality of the Wavefunction: Old Arguments and New
The recent philosophy of Quantum Bayesianism, or QBism, represents an attempt to solve the traditional puzzles in the foundations of quantum theory by denying the objective reality of the quantum
Interpreting Quantum Theory: A Therapeutic Approach
Debates about the foundations of quantum theory usually circle around two main challenges: the so-called 'measurement problem' and a claimed tension between quantum theory and relativity theory that
Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself
TLDR
A variant of Wigner’s friend Gedankenexperiment where each of the current interpretations of QM fails in giving a consistent description, indicating that quantum theory cannot be extrapolated to complex systems, at least not in a straightforward manner.
On the reality of the quantum state
A no-go theorem on the reality of the quantum state is demonstrated. If the quantum state merely represents information about the physical state of a system, then predictions that contradict those of
Bell’s Theorem, Realism, and Locality
According to a recent paper by Tim Maudlin, Bell’s theorem has nothing to tell us about realism or the descriptive completeness of quantum mechanics. What it shows is that quantum mechanics is
Quantum Nonlocality and Reality: Quantum Solipsism and Nonlocality
J.S. Bell’s remarkable 1964 theorem showed that any theory sharing the empirical predictions of orthodox quantum mechanics would have to exhibit a surprising – and, from the point of view of
...
...