Is the Anthropocene really worthy of a formal geologic definition?

@article{Certini2015IsTA,
  title={Is the Anthropocene really worthy of a formal geologic definition?},
  author={Giacomo Certini and Riccardo Scalenghe},
  journal={The Anthropocene Review},
  year={2015},
  volume={2},
  pages={77 - 80}
}
Scientists are actively debating whether the Anthropocene, the geologic time span (GTS) we are now living in, should be considered a period, epoch, or age in the geologic timescale. The solution is not easy, because the beginning of this GTS is undefined and the end unknown. In fact, there is no agreement on when the Anthropocene began, the proposed dates ranging from the Second World War, when radioactive fallout branded soils and sediments all over the world, to little after the end of the… Expand
The question of the human in the Anthropocene debate
The Anthropocene debate is one of the most ambitious scientific programmes of the past 15 or 20 years. Its main argument is that, from a geological point of view, humans are considered a major forceExpand
The Anthropocene’s dating problem: Insights from the geosciences and the humanities
The Anthropocene, generally defined, is the time when human activities have a significant impact on the Earth System. However, the natural sciences, the humanities, and the social sciences haveExpand
Governing the Anthropocene
The growing body of literature on the idea of the Anthropocene has opened up serious questions that go to the heart of the social and human sciences. There has been as yet no satisfactory theoreticalExpand
Anthropocene – a cautious welcome from environmental sociology?
This paper concerns the way in which environmental sociologists might approach the concept of ‘the Anthropocene’. As our title suggests, we extend in the paper a cautious welcome to this concept.Expand
FOOTPRINTS IN THE MUD OF AGADEM Eastern Niger’s way towards the Anthropocene
Petrified footprints of now extinct rhinos and those of humans in the mud of the former lake Agadem may symbolise the beginning of an epoch dominated by humans. How could such a “local” AnthropoceneExpand
Sounding the Alarm: Health in the Anthropocene
  • C. Butler
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • International journal of environmental research and public health
  • 2016
TLDR
This paper builds on a symposium presented by Health-Earth members at the 2015 conference of the International Society for Environmental Epidemiology and concludes that this topic should be prominent within future environmental epidemiology and public health. Expand
Early mining and smelting lead anomalies in geological archives as potential stratigraphic markers for the base of an early Anthropocene
This article reviews possible lower boundaries for an early Anthropocene period. Although a noticeable environmental impact of humans, caused by hunting, the use of fire, forest clearance, animalExpand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 33 REFERENCES
The term ‘Anthropocene’ in the context of formal geological classification
Abstract In recent years, ‘Anthropocene’ has been proposed as an informal stratigraphic term to denote the current interval of anthropogenic global environmental change. A case has also been made toExpand
The Anthropocene
TLDR
It is argued that the debate about the “Age of Humans” is a timely opportunity both to rethink the nature-culture relation and to re-assess the narratives that historians of science, technology, and the environment have written until now. Expand
The stratigraphic status of the Anthropocene
The term Anthropocene was coined to describe the present geological epoch, in which human activity dominates many of the processes acting on the surface of the Earth. The expression has been widelyExpand
The onset of the Anthropocene
Abstract A number of different starting dates for the Anthropocene epoch have been proposed, reflecting different disciplinary perspectives and criteria regarding when human societies first began toExpand
A stratigraphical basis for the Anthropocene?
Abstract Recognition of intimate feedback mechanisms linking changes across the atmosphere, biosphere, geosphere and hydrosphere demonstrates the pervasive nature of humankind's influence, perhaps toExpand
Anthropogenic soils are the golden spikes for the Anthropocene
We propose that the Anthropocene be defined as the last c. 2000 years of the late Holocene and characterized on the basis of anthropogenic soils. This contrasts with the original definition of theExpand
Archaeology. Archaeologists say the 'Anthropocene' is here--but it began long ago.
TLDR
Archaeologists have argued that human impacts on the Earth are dramatic enough to merit a new epoch name—but they also argued that such an epoch should start thousands of years ago, rather than focusing on a relatively sudden planetwide change. Expand
Is there an isotopic signature of the Anthropocene?
We consider whether the Anthropocene is recorded in the isotope geochemistry of the atmosphere, sediments, plants and ice cores, and the time frame during which any changes are recorded, presentingExpand
The end of the Pleistocene: a general critique of chronostratigraphic classification
Formal Chronostratigraphic Units are defined in the International Stratigraphic Guide on the basis of boundary stratotypes and then extended globally as isochronous units. They are unrealistic forExpand
Is the Anthropocene an issue of stratigraphy or pop culture
We thank Jan Zalasiewicz and his colleagues for their thoughtful review and critique of our comment on the stratigraphic relevance of the term Anthropocene. We agree that broad and open discussion isExpand
...
1
2
3
4
...