Is the Anthropocene really worthy of a formal geologic definition?

@article{Certini2015IsTA,
  title={Is the Anthropocene really worthy of a formal geologic definition?},
  author={G. Certini and R. Scalenghe},
  journal={The Anthropocene Review},
  year={2015},
  volume={2},
  pages={77 - 80}
}
  • G. Certini, R. Scalenghe
  • Published 2015
  • Geography
  • The Anthropocene Review
  • Scientists are actively debating whether the Anthropocene, the geologic time span (GTS) we are now living in, should be considered a period, epoch, or age in the geologic timescale. The solution is not easy, because the beginning of this GTS is undefined and the end unknown. In fact, there is no agreement on when the Anthropocene began, the proposed dates ranging from the Second World War, when radioactive fallout branded soils and sediments all over the world, to little after the end of the… CONTINUE READING
    8 Citations
    The question of the human in the Anthropocene debate
    • 24
    • PDF
    Governing the Anthropocene
    • 19
    • PDF
    Sounding the Alarm: Health in the Anthropocene
    • C. Butler
    • Psychology, Medicine
    • International journal of environmental research and public health
    • 2016
    • 23
    • PDF
    What is the «Anthropocene»?

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 33 REFERENCES
    The term ‘Anthropocene’ in the context of formal geological classification
    • 52
    • PDF
    The Anthropocene
    • 1,058
    • PDF
    The onset of the Anthropocene
    • 305
    A stratigraphical basis for the Anthropocene?
    • 138
    • PDF
    Anthropogenic soils are the golden spikes for the Anthropocene
    • 124
    Archaeology. Archaeologists say the 'Anthropocene' is here--but it began long ago.
    • 53
    Is there an isotopic signature of the Anthropocene?
    • 27
    • PDF
    Is the Anthropocene an issue of stratigraphy or pop culture
    • 95
    • PDF