Is socialism really “impossible”?

@article{Caplan2004IsSR,
  title={Is socialism really “impossible”?},
  author={Bryan Caplan},
  journal={Critical Review},
  year={2004},
  volume={16},
  pages={33 - 52}
}
  • B. Caplan
  • Published 1 January 2004
  • Economics
  • Critical Review
Abstract In the 1920s, Austrian‐school economists began to argue that in a fully socialized economy, free of competitively generated prices, central planners would have no way to calculate which methods of production would be the most economical. They claimed that this “economic calculation problem” showed that socialism is “impossible.” Although many believe that the Austrian position was later vindicated by the collapse of the Soviet bloc, the Austrian school's own methodology disallows such… Expand
Socialism: Still impossible after all these years
Department of Economics George Mason University In his recent article, “Is Socialism Really ‘Impossible’?,” Bryan Caplan questions the long-standing Austrian claim that socialism is impossible.Expand
Still impossible after all these years: Reply to Caplan
Abstract Socialism is strictly “impossible.” Its impracticability is not, as Bryan Caplan has suggested, a “quantitative” matter, nor does he show that real‐world socialism's incentive problemsExpand
Calculation and chaos: Reply to Caplan
Abstract Ludwig von Mises argued that (1) economic calculation under socialism is impossible, and that (2) the lack of calculation would entail chaos and starvation. In these pages, Bryan Caplan hasExpand
Incentives vs. knowledge: Reply to Caplan
Abstract In the 1920s, Ludwig von Mises argued correctly that the problem of making economic calculations without market‐generated prices would be an insuperable difficulty for socialist systems ofExpand
Toward a new consensus on the economics of socialism: Rejoinder to my critics
Abstract This has been an unusually productive exchange. My critics largely accept my main theoretical claims about economic calculation and socialism. They have also started to do what advocates ofExpand
Why Socialism Is “ Impossible ” by
In the nineteenth century, critics of socialism generally made two arguments against the establishment of a collectivist society. First, they warned that under a regime of comprehensive socialism theExpand
MISES' CALCULATION ARGUMENT: A CLARIFICATION
IN THIS ARTICLE I WILL DISCUSS MISES’ FAMOUS argument concerning economic calculation under socialism. I will point out that there are in fact two components of this argument. The first part dealsExpand
Relaxing Benevolence: On the Undesirability of Socialist Calculation when Planners are Human
The Austrian calculation argument suggests that inability to engage in economic calculation worsened outcomes in socialist states. We suggest that this is hardly the case. When Austrian assumptionsExpand
Capitalism, Socialism and Calculation
The merits and demerits of what we call ‘capitalism’ have been a source of much attention since Adam Smith wrote his seminal treatise on the salutary effects of free commerce and before. We considerExpand
Rationality of the Individual and Rationality of the System: A Critical Examination of the Economic Calculation Problem Over Socialism
We restate Mises’ argument about the impossibility of socialist calculation through the lenses of modern developments in microeconomic theory. In so doing, we provide an alternative interpretation ofExpand
...
1
2
3
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 29 REFERENCES
From Marx to Mises: Post-Capitalist Society and the Challenge of Economic Calculation
This contribution to economic philosophy considers Marx's pronouncements on the organization of future society, and in this context re-examines the long-lasting debate triggered by Mises's argumentExpand
Hayek and Socialism
Friedrich A. Hayek was a life-long opponent of socialism. Three of his contributions are surveyed and placed within historical context: his debates in the 1930s with the market socialists, hisExpand
Human Action: A Treatise on Economics
4 books in slipcase. Mises attributes the tremendous technological progress and the consequent increase in wealth and general welfare in the last two centuries to the introduction of liberalExpand
The Political Economy of Soviet Socialism: The Formative Years, 1918-1928
1 Introduction.- 2 The Meaning of the First Decade of Soviet Socialism.- 3 The Political Economy of Utopia: Communism in Soviet Russia, 1918-1921.- 4 The Political Economy of NEP: Market RelationsExpand
Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis
This is a newly annotated edition of the classic first published in German in 1922. It is the definitive refutation of nearly every type of socialism ever devised. Mises presents a wide-rangingExpand
Socialism and the market : the socialist calculation debate revisited
Introduction: The Theory and Practice of Economic Planning. Peter J. Boettke VOLUME 1: The Natural Economy Karl Marx Critique of the Gotha Programme (1989) Frederick Engels Socialism: Utopian andExpand
Calculation and Coordination: Essays on Socialism and Transitional Political Economy
1: Why no Austrian Socialists? 1A Appendix: Is economics a moral science? Part I - The Theoretical Framework 2: Economic calculation: The Austrian contribution to political economy 3: Hayek's TheExpand
Mises and hayek dehomogenized
n important contributing factor to the resurgence of Austrian economics in the 1970s was the appearance of a handful of articles which drew the attention of the economics profession to theExpand
Russia under the Bolshevik Regime
One day, you will discover a new adventure and knowledge by spending more money. But when? Do you think that you need to obtain those all requirements when having much money? Why don't you try to getExpand
The Harvest of Sorrow: Soviet Collectivization and the Terror-Famine
The Harvest of Sorrow is the first full history of one of the most horrendous human tragedies of the 20th century. Between 1929 and 1932 the Statistical figures soviet propaganda and early 1930sExpand
...
1
2
3
...