Is recursion language-specific? Evidence of recursive mechanisms in the structure of intentional action

@article{Vicari2014IsRL,
  title={Is recursion language-specific? Evidence of recursive mechanisms in the structure of intentional action},
  author={Giuseppe Vicari and Mauro Adenzato},
  journal={Consciousness and Cognition},
  year={2014},
  volume={26},
  pages={169-188}
}
The language faculty that wasn't: a usage-based account of natural language recursion
TLDR
It is argued that a language faculty is difficult to reconcile with evolutionary considerations, and that the authors' ability to process recursive structure does not rely on recursion as a property of the grammar, but instead emerges gradually by piggybacking on domain-general sequence learning abilities.
The never-ending recursion
Is Language Production Planning Emergent From Action Planning? A Preliminary Investigation
TLDR
The results establish a method for investigating the degree to which language planning is part of a domain- general action planning system and inform debates on the language-specific vs. domain-general nature of planning systems.
Recursion in programs, thought, and language.
TLDR
A theory of recursion in thinking and language is presented that aims to explain how naive individuals devise informal programs in natural language, and is itself implemented in a computer program that creates programs.
The Influence of Language-specific Auditory Cues on the Learnability of Center-embedded Recursion
TLDR
The results showed that tones had a more beneficial learning effect for Chinese than for Dutch participants, suggesting that when participants learned a new language, they were likely to bring their own language routines implicitly from the familiar native language into processing the unfamiliar one.
The Ontogenesis of Action Syntax
TLDR
It is elaborate on the claim that adding an ontogenetic approach will help to obtain a comprehensive picture about both the interplay between language and action and its development, and to answer the question whether the underlying mechanisms of detecting syntactic violations of action sequences are similar to or different from the processing of language Syntactic violations.
Evidence of Grammatical Knowledge in Apes: An Analysis of Kanzi’s Performance on Reversible Sentences
Ape language acquisition studies have demonstrated that apes can learn arbitrary mappings between different auditory or visual patterns and concepts, satisfying the definition of symbol use. The
Mirror Neurons and (Inter)subjectivity: Typological Evidence from East Asian Languages
Language is primarily constituted by action and interaction based on sensorimotor information. This paper demonstrates the nature of subjectivity and intersubjectivity through the neural mechanism
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 127 REFERENCES
What's Special About Human Language? The Contents of the "Narrow Language Faculty" Revisited
TLDR
The recursion-only hypothesis, advocated by Fitch, Hauser and Chomsky, is re-evaluate, with the claim that recursion is a property of all human languages claimed.
The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?
We argue that an understanding of the faculty of language requires substantial interdisciplinary cooperation. We suggest how current developments in linguistics can be profitably wedded to work in
The faculty of language: what's special about it?
Recursion Hypothesis Considered as a Research Program for Cognitive Science
TLDR
It is proposed that there is only one supramodal computational system with recursion in the human mind and that the recursion thesis constitutes a plausible research program for cognitive science.
The redundancy of recursion and infinity for natural language
TLDR
It is argued that the only motivation for recursion is the infinity in natural language and arithmetic competence, which is equally approachable by iteration and recursion, and that a property of natural language is physically uncountable finity and not discrete infinity.
Recursion and the competence/performance distinction in AGL tasks
TLDR
It is demonstrated here that the current focus of the artificial grammar learning literature on recursion blurs the different levels, resulting in three main corollaries: the literature cannot tell us anything about the first level, the explanation for the role of recursion therein lies elsewhere, and much cannot in fact be known about the neural basis of recursions.
Précis of Foundations of language: brain, meaning, grammar, evolution.
TLDR
The goal of this study is to reintegrate the theory of generative grammar into the cognitive sciences, in which phonology, syntax, and semantics are autonomous generative systems linked by interface components.
Reconsidering recursion in syntactic theory
A Usage-Based Approach to Recursion in Sentence Processing
TLDR
A connectionist model embodying this alternative theory is outlined, along with simulation results showing that the model is capable of constituent-like generalizations and that it can fit human data regarding the differential processing difficulty associated with center-embeddings in German and cross-dependencies in Dutch.
What is Language? Some Preliminary Remarks*
There are three essential I want to get across in this article in addition to the analysis of relations of nonlinguistic to linguistic intentionality. First I want to emphasize how the structure of
...
...