Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?

  title={Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?},
  author={Pablo Diniz Batista and M{\^o}nica G. Campiteli and Osame Kinouchi},
The number h of papers with at least h citations has been proposed to evaluate individuals scientific research production. This index is robust in several ways but yet strongly dependent on the research field. We propose a complementary index ) ( 2 T a I N h h = , with ) (T a N being the total number of authors in the considered h papers. A researcher with index hI has hI papers with at least hI citation if he/she had published alone. We have obtained the rank plots of h and h I for four… 
Citation Indices: A Review
  • Nazeer Khan
  • Economics
    Journal of the Pakistan Dental Association
  • 2020
take the equal rank. It does not count the citations, means it ignores theimpact of the publications. Since it is easy to calculate,therefore it is still being used for academic promotions inPakistan
Since Hirsch’s first publication of the h-index in 2005 (Hirsch, 2005), this new measure of academic impact has generated a widespread interest. At the time of writing (January 2007) Google Scholar
Usefulness of Hirsch’s h-index to evaluate scientific research in Spain
The proposed set of indexes accurately summarizes both the success and evolution of scientists’ careers in Spain, and it may be useful in the evaluation of other not well established national scientific research systems.
Comparison of bibliometric measures for assessing relative importance of researchers
Simulated data is used to study factors that could potentially influence the degree of agreement between the rankings obtained when using different indices with the emphasis given to the comparison of the number of net citations per author to other more established indices.
The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation
A large-scale study of scientometric measures, analyzing millions of articles and hundreds of millions of citations across four scientific fields and two data platforms, finds that the correlation of the h-index with awards that indicate recognition by the scientific community has substantially declined.
A case study of the modified Hirsch index hm accounting for multiple coauthors
Although the correlation between the original and the modified Hirsch index is relatively strong, the arrangement of the datasets is significantly different depending on whether they are put into order according to the values of either the original or the modified index.
Two New Simple Bibliometric Indexes to Better Evaluate Research in Economics
The paper proposes two new simple indexes - the k and w indexes - to assess a scientist’s publications record based on citations, superior to the widely used h index, as they preserve all its valuable characteristics and try to overcome its known major shortcomings.
A case study of the modified Hirsch index h m accounting for multiple coauthors
J.E. Hirsch (2005) introduced the h-index to quantify an individual's scientific research output by the largest number h of a scientist's papers, that received at least h citations. This so-called
A new index for the citation curve of researchers
The h-index is introduced, its use is illustrated and it is concluded that the new index provides an added value, since it balances citations and publications through the citation curve.
Two simple new bibliometric indexes to better evaluate research in disciplines where publications typically receive less citations
Two simple new indexes—k and w—to assess a scientist’s publications record based on citations are proposed and are superior to the widely used h index, as they preserve all its valuable characteristics and try to overcome one of its shortcomings.


Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?
It was found that on average the h-index for successful applicants for post-doctoral research fellowships was consistently higher than for non-successful applicants.
Universal Behavior of a Research Productivity Index
Indexes that account for good representations of an individual's productivity are theme of major importance for the evaluation and comparison among researchers. Recently, a new index was proposed
A parameter to quantify dynamics of a researcher's scientific activity
I propose the coefficient, $t_h$, and its modification $N_t$ which in a simple way reflect dynamics of scientific activity of an individual researcher. I determine $t_h$ as a time period (from some
Quantifying Publication Impact
The Random Samples item “Impact factor” (19 Aug., p. [1181][1]) noted the proposal by Jorge Hirsch that the total scientific output of a researcher can be judged by h, the largest number such that the researcher has at least h papers with h citations.
Does co-authorship inflate the share of self-citations?
The authors show that at the macro level multi-authorship does not result in any exaggerate extent of self-citations, as shown in other bibliometric studies.
Citation networks in high energy physics.
The citation network constituted by the SPIRES database is investigated empirically and a consideration of citation distribution by subfield shows that the citation patterns of high energy physics form a remarkably homogeneous network.
Stretched exponential distributions in nature and economy: “fat tails” with characteristic scales
Abstract:To account quantitatively for many reported “natural” fat tail distributions in Nature and Economy, we propose the stretched exponential family as a complement to the often used power law
Index aims for fair ranking of scientists
‘H-index’ sums up publication record.
Are citations of scientific papers a case of nonextensivity?
Abstract:The distribution N(x) of citations of scientific papers has recently been illustrated (on ISI and PRE data sets) and analyzed by Redner (Eur. Phys. J. B 4, 131 (1998)). To fit the data, a
How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution
Abstract:Numerical data for the distribution of citations are examined for: (i) papers published in 1981 in journals which are catalogued by the Institute for Scientific Information (783,339 papers)