Is healthcare providers’ value-neutrality depending on how controversial a medical intervention is? Analysis of 10 more or less controversial interventions

@article{Lyne2017IsHP,
  title={Is healthcare providers’ value-neutrality depending on how controversial a medical intervention is? Analysis of 10 more or less controversial interventions},
  author={Niels Lyn{\"o}e and Joar Bj{\"o}rk and Niklas Juth},
  journal={Clinical Ethics},
  year={2017},
  volume={12},
  pages={117 - 123}
}
Background Swedish healthcare providers are supposed to be value-neutral when making clinical decisions. Recent conducted studies among Swedish physicians have indicated that the proportion of those whose personal values influence decision-making (the value-influenced) vary depending on the framing and the nature of the issue. Objective To examine whether the proportions of value-influenced and value-neutral participants vary depending on the extent to which the intervention is considered… 

Tables from this paper

Value-impregnated factual claims may undermine medical decision-making
TLDR
It is suggested that more research is needed to further examine whether healthcare staff’s personal values influence clinical decision-making via value-impregnated factual claims or assumptions made by healthcare providers.
“Right to recommend, wrong to require”- an empirical and philosophical study of the views among physicians and the general public on smoking cessation as a condition for surgery
TLDR
There is strong support for a policy of smoking cessation prior to surgery in Sweden based on considerations of peri-operative risks as well as the general long term risks of smoking, and the normative reasons speak in favour of the “recommendation strategy”.
How to reveal disguised paternalism: version 2.0
TLDR
An index for identifying disguised paternalism reflects the attitude of a group attitudes towards physician assisted suicide and makes it possible to compare the various medical specialties and age groups from the 2007 study with the 2020 study.
The Evolving Landscape of Global Surgery: A Qualitative Study of North American Surgeons’ Perspectives on Faith-Based and Academic Initiatives
TLDR
This pilot study sought to understand how different faith ideologies influence surgeon motivations and subsequent culture of the global surgery landscape and will inform future studies regarding the collaborations of FBO and NFBO to improve global surgical care.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 34 REFERENCES
Physicians’ personal values in determining medical decision-making capacity: a survey study
TLDR
The findings indicate that physicians’ personal values are of some significance in DMC evaluation, and those physicians with relatively high scores on the value types of achievement, power-resource, face and conformity to interpersonal standards were more likely to apply risk-relative criteria in a range of situations.
Value-impregnated factual claims may undermine medical decision-making
TLDR
It is suggested that more research is needed to further examine whether healthcare staff’s personal values influence clinical decision-making via value-impregnated factual claims or assumptions made by healthcare providers.
Empirical and philosophical analysis of physicians’ judgments of medical indications
TLDR
This study shows that compared to value-neutral physicians, value-influenced physicians are more likely to base decisions of medical indication on medically irrelevant factors (in this case: the patient’s smoking status).
Do strong value-based attitudes influence estimations of future events?
TLDR
A hypothesis maintaining that feeling strongly against controversial medical procedures is associated with being inclined to let one's own beliefs influence the capacity to interpret and estimate empirical results is presented.
Physicians’ practices when frustrating patients’ needs: a comparative study of restrictiveness in offering abortion and sedation therapy
  • N. Lynøe
  • Medicine, Political Science
    Journal of Medical Ethics
  • 2013
TLDR
It is suggested that physicians should openly declare their values when it comes to providing treatments that might shorten life, which might facilitate more genuine shared decision-making and accordingly less suboptimal end-of-life care.
Physicians’ practices when frustrating patients’ needs: a comparative study of restrictiveness in offering abortion and sedation therapy
TLDR
It is suggested that physicians should openly declare their values when it comes to providing treatments that might shorten life, which might facilitate more genuine shared decision-making and accordingly less suboptimal end-of-life care.
Are physicians’ estimations of future events value-impregnated? Cross-sectional study of double intentions when providing treatment that shortens a dying patient’s life
TLDR
The hypothesis—physicians’ estimations of others’ opinions are influenced by their own opinions—was corroborated and might have implications in research as well as in clinical decision-making.
‘Are smokers less deserving of expensive treatment? A randomised controlled trial that goes beyond official values’
TLDR
This study indicates that applying an experimental design allowed us to go beyond the official norms and to show that, compared to a smoking patient, both the general population and physicians are more inclined to treat a non-smoking patient.
End-of-life decisions : studies of attitudes and reasoning
TLDR
There seems to be a widespread consensus regarding competent patients’ right to refrain from life-sustaining treatment, and a significant proportion of Swedish physicians and the general public seem to be more liberal in their views on continuous deep sedation than current guidelines permit.
“Right to recommend, wrong to require”- an empirical and philosophical study of the views among physicians and the general public on smoking cessation as a condition for surgery
TLDR
There is strong support for a policy of smoking cessation prior to surgery in Sweden based on considerations of peri-operative risks as well as the general long term risks of smoking, and the normative reasons speak in favour of the “recommendation strategy”.
...
...