Is continuous adductor canal block better than continuous femoral nerve block after total knee arthroplasty? Effect on ambulation ability, early functional recovery and pain control: a randomized controlled trial.

Abstract

UNLABELLED Total knee arthroplasty is associated with intense, early post-operative pain. Femoral nerve block is known to provide optimal pain relief but reduces the strength of the quadriceps muscle and associated with the risk of falling. Adductor canal block is almost pure sensory blockade with minimal effect on quadriceps muscle strength. We prospectively randomized 100 patients in two groups' continuous adductor and femoral block group. Ambulation ability (Timed up go, 10-m walk, 30 s chair test), time to active SLR, quadsticks, staircase competency, ambulation distance was significantly better (P value < 0.001) in adductor canal group whereas pain scores, opioid consumption showed no significant difference. Adductor canal block provided better ambulation and early functional recovery but without superior analgesia than femoral nerve block post TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, therapeutic study.

DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.06.010
0501001502014201520162017
Citations per Year

182 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 182 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Shah2014IsCA, title={Is continuous adductor canal block better than continuous femoral nerve block after total knee arthroplasty? Effect on ambulation ability, early functional recovery and pain control: a randomized controlled trial.}, author={Nilen Amulak Shah and Nimesh Prakash Jain}, journal={The Journal of arthroplasty}, year={2014}, volume={29 11}, pages={2224-9} }