Is consensus reproducible? A study of an algorithmic guidelines development process.

Abstract

The authors evaluated the reproducibility of a clinical algorithm consensus development process across three different physician panels at a health maintenance organization. Physician groups were composed of primary care internists, who were provided with identical selections from the medical literature and first-draft "seed" algorithms on the management of two common clinical problems: acute sinusitis and dyspepsia. Each panel used nominal group process and a modified Delphi method to create final algorithm drafts. To compare the clinical logic in the final algorithms, the authors applied a new qualitative and quantitative comparison method, the Clinical Algorithm Patient Abstraction (CAPA). Dyspepsia algorithms from all physician groups recommended empiric anti-acid therapy for most patients, favored endoscopy over barium swallow, and had very similar indications for endoscopy. The average CAPA comparison score among final physician algorithms was 6.1 on a scale of 0 (different) to 10 (identical). Sinusitis algorithms from all groups proposed empiric antibiotic therapy for most patients. Indications for sinus radiographs were similar between two algorithms (CAPA = 4.9), but differed significantly in the third, resulting in lower CAPA scores (average CAPA = 1.9, P < 0.03). The clinical similarity of the algorithms produced by these physician panels suggests a high level of reproducibility in this consensus-driven algorithm development process. However, the difference among the sinusitis algorithms suggests that physician consensus groups using a consensus process that a health maintenance organization can do with limited resources will produce some guidelines that vary due to differences in interpretation of evidence and physician experience.

Statistics

050100'98'00'02'04'06'08'10'12'14'16
Citations per Year

198 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 198 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Pearson1995IsCR, title={Is consensus reproducible? A study of an algorithmic guidelines development process.}, author={Steven D. Pearson and Carmi Z Margolis and Selena Davis and Leeann Schreier and H Nancy Sokol and Lawrence Gottlieb}, journal={Medical care}, year={1995}, volume={33 6}, pages={643-60} }