• DOI:10.1108/00220411211225557
• Corpus ID: 11110881

Is classification necessary after Google?

@article{Hjrland2012IsCN,
  title={Is classification necessary after Google?},
  author={Birger Hj{\o}rland},
  journal={J. Documentation},
  year={2012},
  volume={68},
  pages={299-317}
}

• Birger Hjørland
• Published 20 April 2012
• Business
• J. Documentation

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine challenges facing bibliographic classification at both the practical and theoretical levels. At the practical level, libraries are increasingly dispensing with classifying books. At the theoretical level, many researchers, managers, and users believe that the activity of “classification” is not worth the effort, as search engines can be improved without the heavy cost of providing metadata.Design/methodology/approach – The basic issue in classification is seen as providing criteria for deciding whether A should be classified as X. Such decisions are considered to be dependent on the purpose and values inherent in the specific classification process. These decisions are not independent of theories and values in the document being classified, but are dependent on an interpretation of the discourses within those documents.Findings – At the practical level, there is a need to provide high‐quality control mechanisms. At the theoretical level, there is a need to...